Talk:Standard Model: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John R. Brews
(→‎Uppercases?: Reply to Domerque about upper case)
imported>John R. Brews
(→‎Uppercases?: Some other examples)
Line 10: Line 10:


:Thanks for looking at this. It could use some substantial additions. The capitalization of Standard Model is pretty, well,  standard. For example, [http://books.google.com/books?id=Dm36BYq9iu0C&printsec=frontcover Cottingham & Greenwood] not only capitalize it, but shorthand it as in "formulation of the Model". (p. 3) [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 14:54, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
:Thanks for looking at this. It could use some substantial additions. The capitalization of Standard Model is pretty, well,  standard. For example, [http://books.google.com/books?id=Dm36BYq9iu0C&printsec=frontcover Cottingham & Greenwood] not only capitalize it, but shorthand it as in "formulation of the Model". (p. 3) [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 14:54, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
See also [http://books.google.com/books?id=091yo3DrwFkC&printsec=frontcover Ecole d'été de physique]. However, it isn't universal, see [http://books.google.com/books?id=PLYECqs2geEC&printsec=frontcover Burgess & Moore]. [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 15:07, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:07, 30 August 2011

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  A mathematical theory that describes the weak, electromagnetic and strong interactions between leptons and quarks, the basic particles of particle physics. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Physics, Mathematics and Astronomy [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  American English

Only introductory

This article as introduced here is only descriptive and contains nothing of the mathematical structure of the the theory, its history or its experimental underpinnings. John R. Brews 18:51, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Uppercases?

I've just inserted standard model in the disambiguation page about standard. And surprisingly, I've realized that in the present article, Standard Model has initial uppercases. Are these uppercases really necessary? Is it a proper noun?--Domergue Sumien 11:58, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for looking at this. It could use some substantial additions. The capitalization of Standard Model is pretty, well, standard. For example, Cottingham & Greenwood not only capitalize it, but shorthand it as in "formulation of the Model". (p. 3) John R. Brews 14:54, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

See also Ecole d'été de physique. However, it isn't universal, see Burgess & Moore. John R. Brews 15:07, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Standard_Model&oldid=834390"