Baldwin effect: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Anthony.Sebastian (start article on the Baldwin effect) |
imported>Anthony.Sebastian |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
*Simpson GG. (1953) [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2405746 The Baldwin Effect]. ''Evolution'' 7(2):110-117. | [http://fontana.med.harvard.edu/www/Documents/Lab/Documents/simpson.baldwin.1953.pdf Download PDF from harvard edu]. | |||
**<font face="Gill Sans MT"><u>Excerpt:</u> The ability to "acquire" a character has, in itself, a genetical basis. Selection acts (with some exceptions) on the phenotype, so that it is valid to say that selection is actually not on genetical characters but on the ability to acquire character...Seen in a modern context, the Baldwin effect helps to focus attention on a host of problems, especially in developmental (or physiological) genetics, well worthy of further study. It does not, however, seem to require any modification of the opinion that the directive force in adaptation, by the Baldwin effect or in any other particular way, is natural selection. | |||
<hr><br> | <hr><br> | ||
Revision as of 16:12, 15 December 2010
The Baldwin effect describes an evolutionary process whereby learned behaviors become, over a variable number of generations, genetically encoded traits in the gene pool of a species, a non-Lamarckian type of inheritance of acquired characteristics. The concept was first proposed by J. M. Baldwin in 1896, and given a formal evolutionary explication by G. Simpson in 1953.
Notes
References
- Simpson GG. (1953) The Baldwin Effect. Evolution 7(2):110-117. | Download PDF from harvard edu.
- Excerpt: The ability to "acquire" a character has, in itself, a genetical basis. Selection acts (with some exceptions) on the phenotype, so that it is valid to say that selection is actually not on genetical characters but on the ability to acquire character...Seen in a modern context, the Baldwin effect helps to focus attention on a host of problems, especially in developmental (or physiological) genetics, well worthy of further study. It does not, however, seem to require any modification of the opinion that the directive force in adaptation, by the Baldwin effect or in any other particular way, is natural selection.