Macroeconomic policy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner (New page: {{subpages}} <!-- e Deputy Governor of the Bank of England has traced the evolution of monetary policy from the early post-war years when it was assigned only a marginal stabilisation rol...) |
imported>Nick Gardner No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
'''Macroeconomic policy''' is concerned with the use of the instruments of [[fiscal policy]] and [[monetary policy]] to counter the destabilising effects upon the economy of an [[shock (economics)|economic shock]] such as commodity price surge, | |||
a [[panic (banking)|banking panic]] or the bursting of an [[asset price bubble|housing price bubble]]. | |||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
e Deputy Governor of the Bank of England has traced the evolution of monetary policy from the early post-war years when it was assigned only a marginal stabilisation role in favour of what was then thought of as the Keynesian use of fiscal policy - through the unsuccessful attempts <ref> For an account of the British experiment in money supply targeting see Nick Gardner ''Decade of Discontent'', Chapter 5, Blackwell 1987</ref>in the 1980s to target the money supply, that he attributes to [[monetarism]] - to the current consensus, which he classifies as "the neo-classical synthesis" or as "new Keynesian"<ref name=bean> [http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/other/monetary/bean070413.pdf Charles Bean ''Is There a Consensus in Monetary Policy?'']</ref>. Before the [[Great Recession]], the [[/Addendum#Jackson Hole consensus|Jackson Hole consensus]] gave monetary policy the central stabilisation role, and the "new consensus" that emerged during the recession, assigns a secondary a role to [[fiscal policy]], but only under exceptional circumstances. It thus adopts the classical contention of long-run neutrality of money and the sensitivity of expectations to the policy regime, together with the [[Keynesian theory]]'s contention that market rigidities result in a short-term trade-off between economic activity and inflation | e Deputy Governor of the Bank of England has traced the evolution of monetary policy from the early post-war years when it was assigned only a marginal stabilisation role in favour of what was then thought of as the Keynesian use of fiscal policy - through the unsuccessful attempts <ref> For an account of the British experiment in money supply targeting see Nick Gardner ''Decade of Discontent'', Chapter 5, Blackwell 1987</ref>in the 1980s to target the money supply, that he attributes to [[monetarism]] - to the current consensus, which he classifies as "the neo-classical synthesis" or as "new Keynesian"<ref name=bean> [http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/other/monetary/bean070413.pdf Charles Bean ''Is There a Consensus in Monetary Policy?'']</ref>. Before the [[Great Recession]], the [[/Addendum#Jackson Hole consensus|Jackson Hole consensus]] gave monetary policy the central stabilisation role, and the "new consensus" that emerged during the recession, assigns a secondary a role to [[fiscal policy]], but only under exceptional circumstances. It thus adopts the classical contention of long-run neutrality of money and the sensitivity of expectations to the policy regime, together with the [[Keynesian theory]]'s contention that market rigidities result in a short-term trade-off between economic activity and inflation | ||
Revision as of 10:04, 2 March 2013
Macroeconomic policy is concerned with the use of the instruments of fiscal policy and monetary policy to counter the destabilising effects upon the economy of an economic shock such as commodity price surge, a banking panic or the bursting of an housing price bubble.