Talk:Schröder-Bernstein property/Draft: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Peter Schmitt (→Three remarks: new section) |
imported>Boris Tsirelson (→Three remarks: reply) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
# What about more structure by (sub)headings? | # What about more structure by (sub)headings? | ||
--[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 23:55, 25 September 2010 (UTC) | --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 23:55, 25 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
: "noncommutative counterpart" — on one hand, I am waiting for a book from our library about this point; but on the other hand, it is anyway beyond the form "If X is similar to a part of Y and also Y is similar to a part of X then X and Y are similar (to each other)" and only inspired by it. | |||
: "relation to antisymmetry of order" — you are right, this should be noted. | |||
: "structure by (sub)headings" — I also feel the need, but the article is so short, I do not see which headings; do you? [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 06:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:23, 26 September 2010
Three remarks
Nice, Boris. I have only minor comments:
- I think the "noncommutative counterpart" needs some more explanation.
- What do you think of discussing the relation to antisymmetry of order?
- What about more structure by (sub)headings?
--Peter Schmitt 23:55, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- "noncommutative counterpart" — on one hand, I am waiting for a book from our library about this point; but on the other hand, it is anyway beyond the form "If X is similar to a part of Y and also Y is similar to a part of X then X and Y are similar (to each other)" and only inspired by it.
- "relation to antisymmetry of order" — you are right, this should be noted.
- "structure by (sub)headings" — I also feel the need, but the article is so short, I do not see which headings; do you? Boris Tsirelson 06:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)