Electronegativity: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>David Yamakuchi
(Started article)
 
imported>David Yamakuchi
(Add some more...)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Electronegativity''' is a measure of the tendency to attract [[electron]]s.  Generally, it is used in the context of describing one species of [[atom]]'s ([[element]]'s) attraction of electrons in a [[chemical bond]] relative to another species.  A higher electronegativity number indicating a greater tendency for attraction.
{{subpages}}'''Electronegativity''' is a measure of the tendency to attract [[electron]]s.  Generally, it is used in the context of describing one species of [[atom]]'s ([[element]]'s) attraction of electrons in a [[chemical bond]] relative to another species.  A higher electronegativity number indicating a greater tendency for attraction.


The [[Pauling electronegativity scale|Pauling scale]] is the first proposed<ref>http://osulibrary.oregonstate.edu/specialcollections/coll/pauling/bond/narrative/page37.html</ref> and most commonly used measure of electronegativity<ref>http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/chemical/bondd.html</ref>. In this scale, [[Fluorine]] (the most electronegative element) is assigned a value of 4.0, and [[francium]] (the least electronegative) a value of 0.7. [[Mulliken electronegativity]], [[Allred–Rochow electronegativity]], [[Allen electronegativity]], and [[Sanderson electronegativity]] are other ways that have been proposed to quantify this same phenomena.
The [[Pauling electronegativity scale|Pauling scale]] (named after [[Nobel Prize]] winning Chemist [[Linus Pauling]]) is the first proposed<ref>http://osulibrary.oregonstate.edu/specialcollections/coll/pauling/bond/narrative/page37.html</ref> and most commonly used measure of electronegativity<ref>http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/chemical/bondd.html</ref>. In this scale, [[Fluorine]] (the most electronegative element) is assigned a value of 4.0, and [[francium]] (the least electronegative) a value of 0.7. [[Mulliken electronegativity]], [[Allred–Rochow electronegativity]], [[Allen electronegativity]], and [[Sanderson electronegativity]] are other ways that have been proposed to quantify this same phenomena.


Electronegativity is not strictly an atomic property however. The various methods of "measuring" electronegativity actually indicate behavior of atoms in molecules.  The equivalent property of a "free atom" is termed [[electron affinity]]. It has been observed that the electronegativity of elements vary with environment<ref>http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp053068f</ref>. There is also a theoretical "[[inverse]]" of electronegativity, [[electropositivity]], which is a measure of an atomic species' tendency to give up electrons to a chemical bond.
Electronegativity is not strictly an atomic property however. The various methods of "[[measuring]]" electronegativity actually indicate behavior of atoms in [[molecules]].  The equivalent property of a "free atom" is termed [[electron affinity]]. It has been observed that the electronegativity of elements can vary with environment<ref>http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp053068f</ref>. There is also a theoretical "[[inverse]]" of electronegativity, [[electropositivity]], which is a measure of an atomic species' tendency to give up electrons to a chemical bond.


The practical effects of electronegativity can be seen in all life on [[Earth]].  The transfer of electrons between [[carbon]] (C) and [[oxygen]] (O) allows the storage and release of [[energy]] transmitted to Earth from the [[Sun]].
The practical effects of electronegativity can be seen in all [[life]] on [[Earth]].  The transfer of electrons between [[carbon]] (C) and [[oxygen]] (O) allows the storage and release of [[energy]] [[Radiation|transmitted]] to Earth from the [[Sun]].


<blockquote>The process of [[photosynthesis]] transfers electrons from a lower to a higher [[potential energy]] (O to C). (A higher "potential energy" because Oxygen tends to attract the electrons more strongly than Carbon...thus, [[work]] must be done to effect this transfer.)</blockquote>
<blockquote>The process of [[photosynthesis]] changes complex molecules from a lower to a higher [[potential energy]] (electrons are drawn away from O toward C). This requires a higher potential energy because Oxygen tends to attract the electrons more strongly than Carbon due to the relative electronegativities...thus, [[work]] must be done to effect this change and form a [[carbohydrate]].)</blockquote>
<blockquote>[[Cellular respiration]]'s net effect is to transfer electrons back down to a lower (C to O) potential, thus releasing energy for use in the [[cell]].  This phenomenon can be seen in most other forms of chemical [[oxidation]] as well.</blockquote>
<blockquote>[[Cellular respiration]]'s net effect is to transfer electrons back down to a lower (C to O) potential, thus releasing energy for use in the [[cell]].  This phenomenon can be seen in other forms of chemical [[oxidation]] as well.</blockquote>


<blockquote><small>One note here, in the photosynthesis described above, Oxygen atoms can be said to undergo "[[Oxidation]]" in the sense that their electrons are drawn farther away from their [[nucleus|nuclei]].  This is more a confusing [[semantics|semantic]] artifact of the definition of "oxidation" than a question of actual importance in [[Chemistry]].  The bottom line: In photosynthesis, oxygen is oxidized and Carbon is reduced.  When "[[burning]]" the resulting [[carbohydrate]], the reverse is true.</small>
<blockquote><small>One note here, in the photosynthesis described above, Oxygen atoms can be said to undergo "[[Oxidation]]" in the sense that their electrons are drawn farther away from their [[nucleus|nuclei]].  This is more a confusing [[semantics|semantic]] artifact of the definition of "oxidation" than a question of actual importance in [[Chemistry]].  The bottom line: In photosynthesis, oxygen is oxidized and Carbon is [[Reduction|reduced]].  When "[[oxidation|burning]]" the resulting [[carbohydrate]], the reverse is true.</small>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
The relative electronegativity of two interacting atoms also plays a major part in determining what kind of chemical bond forms between them.  These types of bonds are characterized as [[covalent bond|covalent]], [[polar covalent bond|polar]], and [[ionic bond|ionic]].
The relative electronegativity of two atoms also indicates important characteristics of the bond that forms between them.  Bonds are often characterized as [[Chemical bond|covalent]] when the electronegativities are basically equal, [[Chemical bond|polar]] when there is some difference in electronegativities, and [[Chemical bond|ionic]] when there is a greater difference.  These characterizations are typically considered oversimplified generalizations by more advanced scholars however, and a more complete explanation of observed behavior of these different types of bonds has been attempted by applying [[Coulomb's law]] and principles of [[Quantum chemistry]].


<references/>
<references/>

Revision as of 11:23, 4 May 2010

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Electronegativity is a measure of the tendency to attract electrons. Generally, it is used in the context of describing one species of atom's (element's) attraction of electrons in a chemical bond relative to another species. A higher electronegativity number indicating a greater tendency for attraction.

The Pauling scale (named after Nobel Prize winning Chemist Linus Pauling) is the first proposed[1] and most commonly used measure of electronegativity[2]. In this scale, Fluorine (the most electronegative element) is assigned a value of 4.0, and francium (the least electronegative) a value of 0.7. Mulliken electronegativity, Allred–Rochow electronegativity, Allen electronegativity, and Sanderson electronegativity are other ways that have been proposed to quantify this same phenomena.

Electronegativity is not strictly an atomic property however. The various methods of "measuring" electronegativity actually indicate behavior of atoms in molecules. The equivalent property of a "free atom" is termed electron affinity. It has been observed that the electronegativity of elements can vary with environment[3]. There is also a theoretical "inverse" of electronegativity, electropositivity, which is a measure of an atomic species' tendency to give up electrons to a chemical bond.

The practical effects of electronegativity can be seen in all life on Earth. The transfer of electrons between carbon (C) and oxygen (O) allows the storage and release of energy transmitted to Earth from the Sun.

The process of photosynthesis changes complex molecules from a lower to a higher potential energy (electrons are drawn away from O toward C). This requires a higher potential energy because Oxygen tends to attract the electrons more strongly than Carbon due to the relative electronegativities...thus, work must be done to effect this change and form a carbohydrate.)

Cellular respiration's net effect is to transfer electrons back down to a lower (C to O) potential, thus releasing energy for use in the cell. This phenomenon can be seen in other forms of chemical oxidation as well.

One note here, in the photosynthesis described above, Oxygen atoms can be said to undergo "Oxidation" in the sense that their electrons are drawn farther away from their nuclei. This is more a confusing semantic artifact of the definition of "oxidation" than a question of actual importance in Chemistry. The bottom line: In photosynthesis, oxygen is oxidized and Carbon is reduced. When "burning" the resulting carbohydrate, the reverse is true.

The relative electronegativity of two atoms also indicates important characteristics of the bond that forms between them. Bonds are often characterized as covalent when the electronegativities are basically equal, polar when there is some difference in electronegativities, and ionic when there is a greater difference. These characterizations are typically considered oversimplified generalizations by more advanced scholars however, and a more complete explanation of observed behavior of these different types of bonds has been attempted by applying Coulomb's law and principles of Quantum chemistry.