Open Knowledge Conference/Program/A Year in Review: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen
(backlink)
imported>Daniel Mietchen
(→‎Notes and comments: pasted in from http://piratepad.net/ep/pad/view/kDyWnVVfrn/rev.3358)
Line 29: Line 29:
and wikilink as appropriate.
and wikilink as appropriate.
-->
-->
Type comments here.
Intro from Rufus Pollock:
 
    * Is a not for profit organisation
 
    * OKFN is building on history of other orgs, such as
 
    * Concept of 'open' goes back to Chinese book printing.
 
    * Open is about technology
 
    * Open requires people to declare it, via a license.
 
    * OKFN has ~12 working groups and projects that are then attached to those groups.
 
    * Other OKFN chapters launching = Leipzig launching in May
 
    * if interested in forming your own group contact them (@EvoMRI did)
 
    * "the year open data went mainstream" - data.gov.uk launched in January
 
    * Props to John Sheridan and his political push for open data, e.g. data.gov.uk
 
    * Central Gov't is changing their viewpoint towards open.
 
    * CKAN powers data.gov.uk and is used by 5 other orgs = open catalogue
 
    * "On our way to realising the Debian of Data"
 
    * getting people together to interoperate with data
 
    * most people suck at data - spreadsheets
 
    * [God, I wish the Rewired State people would realise this. CSV dumps is leeches, XML is penicillin, RDF is an MRI scan. -Tom] <-- I like it (me too, but I'm MRI-biased)
 
    * lots of people, not very co-ordinated
 
    * "RDF is very high cost" [any more than writing a SQL schema? An XML format? CSV headers? I don't buy it. It is like the whole thing with type systems - yeah, you can do def foo(x, y) but you have to mentally keep track of the types in your head rather than letting the computer do it for you. -Tom]
 
    * new OKFN WGs: EU, bibliographic information, development, archaeology
 
    * bibliographic information - Swedish and German national libraries now publish linked data
 
    * Exemplars
 
    *  Where does my money go <http://www.wheredoesmymoneygo.org/>
 
    * Open Shakespeare <http://www.openshakespeare.org/>
 
    * Kforge
 
    * Public domain works calc
 
    * opendefinition.org
 
    * PantonPriciples
 
    * Open Database Licences
 
    * Oneclickor.gs <http://www.oneclickor.gs/>
 
    * OKFN built demonstrator to show whereealth, education, public, economic affairs, defence, public safety, social protection...etc
 
    * money tracking via data is only skin deep, in the billions, not able to easily track in the millions.
 
    * The 3 S's = Search, Storage and Services
 
    * these three are the infrastratructure for our scoiety
 
    * we are too happy with closed
 
    * /end
 
    * Q&A
 
    * what's going on with open bibliographic data, who owns it?
 
    * OKFN trying to work more with Cambridge and BL to publish bib data.
 
    * What about in other countries?  How will it pan out for them?
 
    * UK has been a leader in this area because of political push, i.e. TBL, etc.
 
    * What about the political motivations?
 
    * "Whoever wins will be committed to going down this route"
 
    * Can't put the genie back in the bottle

Revision as of 06:20, 24 April 2010



Back to State of the Nation session

Title

A Year in Review

Authors

Rufus Pollock

Keywords

open data

Abstract

Paste abstract in here.

Notes and comments

Intro from Rufus Pollock:

   * Is a not for profit organisation
   * OKFN is building on history of other orgs, such as 
   * Concept of 'open' goes back to Chinese book printing.
   * Open is about technology 
   * Open requires people to declare it, via a license.
   * OKFN has ~12 working groups and projects that are then attached to those groups.
   * Other OKFN chapters launching = Leipzig launching in May
   * if interested in forming your own group contact them (@EvoMRI did)
   * "the year open data went mainstream" - data.gov.uk launched in January
   * Props to John Sheridan and his political push for open data, e.g. data.gov.uk
   * Central Gov't is changing their viewpoint towards open.
   * CKAN powers data.gov.uk and is used by 5 other orgs = open catalogue
   * "On our way to realising the Debian of Data"
   * getting people together to interoperate with data
   * most people suck at data - spreadsheets
   * [God, I wish the Rewired State people would realise this. CSV dumps is leeches, XML is penicillin, RDF is an MRI scan. -Tom] <-- I like it (me too, but I'm MRI-biased)
   * lots of people, not very co-ordinated
   * "RDF is very high cost" [any more than writing a SQL schema? An XML format? CSV headers? I don't buy it. It is like the whole thing with type systems - yeah, you can do def foo(x, y) but you have to mentally keep track of the types in your head rather than letting the computer do it for you. -Tom]
   * new OKFN WGs: EU, bibliographic information, development, archaeology
   * bibliographic information - Swedish and German national libraries now publish linked data
   * Exemplars
   *  Where does my money go <http://www.wheredoesmymoneygo.org/>
   * Open Shakespeare <http://www.openshakespeare.org/>
   * Kforge
   * Public domain works calc
   * opendefinition.org
   * PantonPriciples
   * Open Database Licences
   * Oneclickor.gs <http://www.oneclickor.gs/>
   * OKFN built demonstrator to show whereealth, education, public, economic affairs, defence, public safety, social protection...etc
   * money tracking via data is only skin deep, in the billions, not able to easily track in the millions.
   * The 3 S's = Search, Storage and Services
   * these three are the infrastratructure for our scoiety
   * we are too happy with closed
   * /end
   * Q&A
   * what's going on with open bibliographic data, who owns it?
   * OKFN trying to work more with Cambridge and BL to publish bib data.
   * What about in other countries?  How will it pan out for them?
   * UK has been a leader in this area because of political push, i.e. TBL, etc.
   * What about the political motivations?
   * "Whoever wins will be committed to going down this route"
   * Can't put the genie back in the bottle