Talk:People's Republic of China/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
imported>John Stephenson ({{archive box|auto=long}}) |
John Leach (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "China" to "China") |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Name== | ==Name== | ||
The question is whether this will concern everything about the PRC, or only its history and politics. If everything, then the article should be continuous with the | The question is whether this will concern everything about the PRC, or only its history and politics. If everything, then the article should be continuous with the China article. If not everything, then we ought to make a statement to that effect near the top of the talk page. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 10:02, 18 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
== merge == | == merge == | ||
Every major country has gone through many regine changes but they are all covered in the same article-- Russia, France, Britain, India etc. It is hard to see why this is somehow separate from the | Every major country has gone through many regine changes but they are all covered in the same article-- Russia, France, Britain, India etc. It is hard to see why this is somehow separate from the China article? [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 19:08, 7 December 2007 (CST) | ||
== unencyclopedic == | == unencyclopedic == | ||
Latest revision as of 09:10, 28 February 2024
Size
To anticipate discussion: yes, I know Russia is also in East Asia, and that Russia is larger than China. However, 'East Asia' tends to refer to China, the two Koreas, Japan and the south-eastern states like Thailand; Russia is not culturally part of this, and Russian people are mostly not Asian people. In any case most of Russia's on the other side of the Eurasian continent. But rewrite if you want... John Stephenson 04:21, 18 May 2007 (CDT)
Bias
I've tried to be even-handed in starting this article (for the record, I've had friends in the PRC as well as Taiwan, and I live in Japan). You may think it brushes past the human rights issues too much, or that it makes nice too much with the Communists, etc. Alternatively, you may think it's too critical. Others are welcome to hack away at it. John Stephenson 04:37, 18 May 2007 (CDT)
- The human rights abuses are already recognized by the House and Department of State report, so it's not controversial to include them. Yi Zhe Wu 13:51, 23 June 2007 (CDT)
- I don't think we should make this a U.S.-Centric concept. I recommend we tread carefully over this issue to illustrate the most factually accurate viewpoint possible.--Robert W King 13:56, 23 June 2007 (CDT)
Name
The question is whether this will concern everything about the PRC, or only its history and politics. If everything, then the article should be continuous with the China article. If not everything, then we ought to make a statement to that effect near the top of the talk page. --Larry Sanger 10:02, 18 May 2007 (CDT)
merge
Every major country has gone through many regine changes but they are all covered in the same article-- Russia, France, Britain, India etc. It is hard to see why this is somehow separate from the China article? Richard Jensen 19:08, 7 December 2007 (CST)
unencyclopedic
the article is not encyclopedic and is not up to CZ quality. (try outlining it) -- it is a disorganized essay that jumps from topic to topic, and gets itself mixed up with China. Richard Jensen 15:23, 8 December 2007 (CST)
- still no improvement. I dropped the vague section about unnamed Asian countries. Next to go will be the weak section on UK that says little about the Honk Kong issueRichard Jensen 00:53, 10 December 2007 (CST)
merge into China
there is no need for this as a separate article. Richard Jensen 21:40, 16 February 2008 (CST)
Oh yes there is. John Stephenson 13:09, 29 December 2010 (UTC)