Talk:English Civil War: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson
(New page: {{subpages}})
 
imported>Peter Jackson
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
<blockquote>From 1649 to 1659 the monarchy was abolished and replaced by the Commonwealth of England (1649-1653; 1659-1660) and a Protectorate (1653-1659), a military regime headed by Cromwell and later his son Richard</blockquote>
This seems to contradict itself. I think the first 1659 should be 1660.
Also, I don't think the protectorate ceased being called a commonwealth too, though at some point (1653?) it became Great Britain.
A more tangential thought. This article, like many sources on civil wars, talks of dividing families. I came across an interesting idea, that, for landed families, this was a deliberate policy: whoever won, there's be a member of the family on the winning side, with a good chance of keeping the family lands. I don't know whether this is taken seriously by historians, and if so whether it belongs in the article. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] ([[User talk:Peter Jackson|talk]]) 08:54, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:54, 25 July 2017

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition 1641-1651 conflict between Parliamentarians and Royalists loyal to the monarchy. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories History and Military [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

From 1649 to 1659 the monarchy was abolished and replaced by the Commonwealth of England (1649-1653; 1659-1660) and a Protectorate (1653-1659), a military regime headed by Cromwell and later his son Richard

This seems to contradict itself. I think the first 1659 should be 1660.

Also, I don't think the protectorate ceased being called a commonwealth too, though at some point (1653?) it became Great Britain.

A more tangential thought. This article, like many sources on civil wars, talks of dividing families. I came across an interesting idea, that, for landed families, this was a deliberate policy: whoever won, there's be a member of the family on the winning side, with a good chance of keeping the family lands. I don't know whether this is taken seriously by historians, and if so whether it belongs in the article. Peter Jackson (talk) 08:54, 25 July 2017 (UTC)