Talk:Boundary point: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Boris Tsirelson (→every point is a boundary case: new section) |
imported>Boris Tsirelson |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
"...every point is a boundary case, or there is no boundary point at all — are both possible. In the first case the set is said to be dense in the space" — Really? The whole space is a (trivial) example of a dense set, but belongs to the latter case, not the former one. The condition "every point of the space is a boundary point of the given set" is equivalent rather to "the given set and its complement are both dense". [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 09:18, 4 October 2009 (UTC) | "...every point is a boundary case, or there is no boundary point at all — are both possible. In the first case the set is said to be dense in the space" — Really? The whole space is a (trivial) example of a dense set, but belongs to the latter case, not the former one. The condition "every point of the space is a boundary point of the given set" is equivalent rather to "the given set and its complement are both dense". [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 09:18, 4 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
Well, I understand that implication was meant, not equivalence. But, maybe, it is better to write "In the first case the set is said to be dense in the space (as well as its complement)." [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 09:23, 4 October 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:23, 4 October 2009
every point is a boundary case
"...every point is a boundary case, or there is no boundary point at all — are both possible. In the first case the set is said to be dense in the space" — Really? The whole space is a (trivial) example of a dense set, but belongs to the latter case, not the former one. The condition "every point of the space is a boundary point of the given set" is equivalent rather to "the given set and its complement are both dense". Boris Tsirelson 09:18, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Well, I understand that implication was meant, not equivalence. But, maybe, it is better to write "In the first case the set is said to be dense in the space (as well as its complement)." Boris Tsirelson 09:23, 4 October 2009 (UTC)