Transition element: Difference between revisions
imported>Paul Wormer No edit summary |
imported>Paul Wormer No edit summary |
||
| Line 140: | Line 140: | ||
In the past the group 12 elements [[zinc]] (Zn), [[cadmium]] (Cd), and [[mercury]] (Hg), that are included in the "d-block" of the periodic table, have often been considered as transition elements, but they are nowadays rarely considered as such, because their compounds lack some of their characteristic properties. | In the past the group 12 elements [[zinc]] (Zn), [[cadmium]] (Cd), and [[mercury]] (Hg), that are included in the "d-block" of the periodic table, have often been considered as transition elements, but they are nowadays rarely considered as such, because their compounds lack some of their characteristic properties. | ||
Because [[scandium]] (Sc), [[yttrium]] (Y), and [[lanthanum]] (La) actually do not form compounds analogous to those of the other transition elements and because their chemistry is quite homologous to that of the [[lanthanoid]]s (previously known as | Because [[scandium]] (Sc), [[yttrium]] (Y), and [[lanthanum]] (La) actually do not form compounds analogous to those of the other transition elements and because their chemistry is quite homologous to that of the [[lanthanoid]]s (previously known as lanthanides), they are often excluded from the group of transition elements. A strict application of the definition would describe also [[lutetium]] (Lu) as a transition element as it has a singly occupied 5''d'' orbital in its ground state, but according to IUPAC<ref name ="IUPAC">{{cite news| url=http://www.iupac.org/reports/provisional/abstract04/connelly_310804.html | title =IUPAC Provisional Recommendations for the Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry (online draft of an updated version of the "''Red Book''" IR 3-6)| date =2004| accessdate = 17/9/2009}}</ref> it is a lanthanoid. Lutetium appears most commonly as a positive ion without ''d''-electrons in the valence shell and without the characteristic properties of a transition element. | ||
==Properties== | ==Properties== | ||
| Line 148: | Line 148: | ||
The transition elements form many useful alloys, among themselves and with other metallic elements. Most of these elements can be dissolved in water and other polar solvents and form complexes in solution, although the "noble" metals platinum, [[silver]], and [[gold]] are difficult to dissolve. For obvious reasons the elements [[copper]], silver, and gold are referred to as coinage metals<ref>B. H. Lipshutz and Y. Yamamoto. ''Introduction'', Special issue of Chemical Reviews on Coinage Metals in Organic Synthesis, 2008, vol. '''108''', pp. 2793–2795 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr800415x DOI]</ref>. Note that copper belongs to the class of coinage metals, but is not a noble metal. | The transition elements form many useful alloys, among themselves and with other metallic elements. Most of these elements can be dissolved in water and other polar solvents and form complexes in solution, although the "noble" metals platinum, [[silver]], and [[gold]] are difficult to dissolve. For obvious reasons the elements [[copper]], silver, and gold are referred to as coinage metals<ref>B. H. Lipshutz and Y. Yamamoto. ''Introduction'', Special issue of Chemical Reviews on Coinage Metals in Organic Synthesis, 2008, vol. '''108''', pp. 2793–2795 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr800415x DOI]</ref>. Note that copper belongs to the class of coinage metals, but is not a noble metal. | ||
The outer ''s''-electrons of the transition elements are easily lost to the bonding partners (''ligands'') of the element. Also one or more ''d''-electrons are usually lost to its ligands. In other words, most transition element compounds show ionic chemical bonds. The formal charge of the element is known as its oxidation number, or [[oxidation state]]. Table III shows the most common oxidation states of the first transition series | Common transition metal complexes are: oxides, halides (F<sup>−</sup>, Cl<sup>−</sup>, Br<sup>−</sup>, I<sup>−</sup>), hydrates, and sulphates. The outer ''s''-electrons of the transition elements are easily lost to the bonding partners (the ''ligands'') of the element. Also one or more ''d''-electrons are usually lost to its ligands. In other words, most transition element compounds show ionic chemical bonds. The formal charge of the ionically bound element is known as its oxidation number, or [[oxidation state]]. Table III shows the most common oxidation states of the first transition series.<ref>B. Hathaway, ''An alternative approach to the teaching of systematic transition metal chemistry'', Journal of Chemical Education, vol. '''56''', pp. 390–392 (1979)</ref> Note in this table that the elements exhibit variable [[oxidation state]]s. The chemistry of the transition series is mainly that of the ions in one of their several oxidation states, and not that of the elemental form itself. For instance the element [[chromium]] (Cr) in the ionic water complex chromium hexahydrate, Cr(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>6</sub><sup>3+</sup>, is trivalent and is denoted by the oxidation state Cr(III). (This is because water has formal oxidation number zero.) The very commonly occurring Cr(III) cation has electronic structure [Ar](3''d'')<sup>3</sup>. The chromium in Cr(CN)<sub>6</sub><sup>4−</sup> is divalent, denoted by Cr(II), and has electronic structure [Ar](3''d'')<sup>4</sup>. Chromate [CrO<sub>4</sub>]<sup>2−</sup> contains Cr(VI), which is isoelectronic with [[argon]]. | ||
Although most theoretical descriptions of transition metal complexes assume (often implicitly) ionic bonds, quantum mechanical calculations show that most of the bonds have a good deal of covalent character. However, in qualitative and semi-quantitative considerations, based on empirical parameters, the assumption of ionic bonds with positively charged transition metals provides much insight and yields a systematization of the properties of the transition metal complexes. | This classification of transition elements in different oxidation states, although widely applied, is not supported by quantum mechanical calculations. Although most theoretical descriptions of transition metal complexes assume (often implicitly) ionic bonds, quantum mechanical calculations show that most of the bonds have a good deal of covalent character. Calculations bear out that transfer of more than one full electron to the ligands occurs rarely, let alone six electrons as in Cr(VI). However, in qualitative and semi-quantitative considerations, based on empirical parameters, the assumption of ionic bonds with positively charged transition metals provides much insight and yields a systematization of the properties of the transition metal complexes. | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
| Line 251: | Line 251: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
==Quantum mechanical description== | |||
In a landmark paper<ref>H. Bethe, ''Termaufspaltung in Kristallen'' [Term splitting in cystals], Annalen der Physik, Fünfte Folge, vol. '''3''', p. 133–206 (1929) [http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k15392p.pleinepage.r=Annalen+der+Physic.f141.langFR Online]. English translation: ''Selected Works of Hans Bethe'', World Scientific, Singapore (1997) | |||
[http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=5baAG1WqgYQC&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=%22hans+Bethe%22++%22Annalen+der+Physik%22+1929&ots=9x5FdvBvAf&sig=eLNRyGjIRsdUezcmnDUARgP1MKU#v=onepage&q=&f=false Google Books (online)] | |||
</ref> [[Hans Bethe]] introduced in 1929 a model known as the crystal field model. This model successfully accounts for some magnetic properties and colors of transition metal complexes. It departs from a central transition metal ion in an electrostatic field offered by the surrounding charged ligands. The model does not attempt to describe why this configuration is stable. Later the crystal field model was extended by the admixture of ligand orbitals into the atomic orbitals of the central ion. This extended model is known as the ligand field model. | |||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
Revision as of 11:10, 30 September 2009
(Under construction)
A transition element is a chemical element element whose atomic electron configuration describing the ground (lowest energy) state has an incompletely filled d sub-shell. Here d stands for an atomic orbital with angular momentum quantum number ℓ = 2. That is, the electron configuration of transition element atoms contains (nd)k, 1 ≤ k ≤ 9, where n is a principal quantum number, n = 3, 4, 5, see table II. The incomplete electronic d subshell gives rise to some characteristic magnetic properties (paramagnetism and ferromagnetism) and crystals and solutions of transition metal complexes that are brightly colored.
The first three series of the transition elements are shown in table I.
| Group | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st series | Sc (21) | Ti (22) | V (23) | Cr (24) | Mn (25) | Fe (26) | Co (27) | Ni (28) | Cu (29) |
| 2nd series | Y (39) | Zr (40) | Nb (41) | Mo (42) | Tc (43) | Ru (44) | Rh (45) | Pd (46) | Ag (47) |
| 3rd series | La (57) | Hf (72) | Ta (73) | W (74) | Re (75) | Os (76) | Ir (77) | Pt (78) | Au (79) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exceptions to the definition
The elements in the fourth transition series (period 7 of the periodic table), are formally transition elements. They are man-made [except for Actinium (Z = 87)] and short-lived, not much is known about their compounds and accordingly they are not discussed in this article.
Although the atoms copper (Cu), silver (Ag), and gold (Au) have in their lowest energy state a filled d sub-shell—they have the configuration (nd)10(n+1)s1, with n = 3, 4, and 5, respectively—after ionization (loss of two or more electrons) their cations have an incomplete d sub-shell. Since these cations appear in many complexes, copper, silver, and gold are usually seen as transition elements.
In the past the group 12 elements zinc (Zn), cadmium (Cd), and mercury (Hg), that are included in the "d-block" of the periodic table, have often been considered as transition elements, but they are nowadays rarely considered as such, because their compounds lack some of their characteristic properties.
Because scandium (Sc), yttrium (Y), and lanthanum (La) actually do not form compounds analogous to those of the other transition elements and because their chemistry is quite homologous to that of the lanthanoids (previously known as lanthanides), they are often excluded from the group of transition elements. A strict application of the definition would describe also lutetium (Lu) as a transition element as it has a singly occupied 5d orbital in its ground state, but according to IUPAC[1] it is a lanthanoid. Lutetium appears most commonly as a positive ion without d-electrons in the valence shell and without the characteristic properties of a transition element.
Properties
The most striking similarities shared by the transition elements is that they are all metals—which is why they are often called transition metals—and that most of them are hard, strong, and shiny. They have high melting and boiling points, and, being metals, are good conductors of heat and electricity. Many of the elements are technologically important: iron, nickel, cobalt, palladium, platinum, and others are used in heterogeneous catalysis. Much of the current research on the chemistry of transition element complexes is instigated by their industrial importance as catalysts.
The transition elements form many useful alloys, among themselves and with other metallic elements. Most of these elements can be dissolved in water and other polar solvents and form complexes in solution, although the "noble" metals platinum, silver, and gold are difficult to dissolve. For obvious reasons the elements copper, silver, and gold are referred to as coinage metals[2]. Note that copper belongs to the class of coinage metals, but is not a noble metal.
Common transition metal complexes are: oxides, halides (F−, Cl−, Br−, I−), hydrates, and sulphates. The outer s-electrons of the transition elements are easily lost to the bonding partners (the ligands) of the element. Also one or more d-electrons are usually lost to its ligands. In other words, most transition element compounds show ionic chemical bonds. The formal charge of the ionically bound element is known as its oxidation number, or oxidation state. Table III shows the most common oxidation states of the first transition series.[3] Note in this table that the elements exhibit variable oxidation states. The chemistry of the transition series is mainly that of the ions in one of their several oxidation states, and not that of the elemental form itself. For instance the element chromium (Cr) in the ionic water complex chromium hexahydrate, Cr(H2O)63+, is trivalent and is denoted by the oxidation state Cr(III). (This is because water has formal oxidation number zero.) The very commonly occurring Cr(III) cation has electronic structure [Ar](3d)3. The chromium in Cr(CN)64− is divalent, denoted by Cr(II), and has electronic structure [Ar](3d)4. Chromate [CrO4]2− contains Cr(VI), which is isoelectronic with argon.
This classification of transition elements in different oxidation states, although widely applied, is not supported by quantum mechanical calculations. Although most theoretical descriptions of transition metal complexes assume (often implicitly) ionic bonds, quantum mechanical calculations show that most of the bonds have a good deal of covalent character. Calculations bear out that transfer of more than one full electron to the ligands occurs rarely, let alone six electrons as in Cr(VI). However, in qualitative and semi-quantitative considerations, based on empirical parameters, the assumption of ionic bonds with positively charged transition metals provides much insight and yields a systematization of the properties of the transition metal complexes.
| Sc | Ti | V | Cr | Mn | Fe | Co | Ni | Cu |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I(d5 ) | I(d10) | |||||||
| II(d1 ) | II(d2 ) | II(d3 ) | II(d4 ) | II(d5 ) | II(d6 ) | II(d7 ) | II(d8 ) | II(d9 ) |
| III(d0 ) | III(d1 ) | III(d2 ) | III(d3 ) | III(d4 ) | III(d5 ) | III(d6 ) | III(d7 ) | III(d8 ) |
| IV(d0) | IV(d1) | IV(d2 ) | IV(d3 ) | IV(d4 ) | IV(d5 ) | IV(d6 ) | ||
| V(d0 ) | V(d1 ) | V(d2 ) | V(d3 ) | V(d4 ) | ||||
| VI(d0 ) | VI(d1 ) | VI(d2 ) | ||||||
| VII(d0 ) |
Quantum mechanical description
In a landmark paper[4] Hans Bethe introduced in 1929 a model known as the crystal field model. This model successfully accounts for some magnetic properties and colors of transition metal complexes. It departs from a central transition metal ion in an electrostatic field offered by the surrounding charged ligands. The model does not attempt to describe why this configuration is stable. Later the crystal field model was extended by the admixture of ligand orbitals into the atomic orbitals of the central ion. This extended model is known as the ligand field model.
Reference
- ↑ IUPAC Provisional Recommendations for the Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry (online draft of an updated version of the "Red Book" IR 3-6), 2004. Retrieved on 17/9/2009.
- ↑ B. H. Lipshutz and Y. Yamamoto. Introduction, Special issue of Chemical Reviews on Coinage Metals in Organic Synthesis, 2008, vol. 108, pp. 2793–2795 DOI
- ↑ B. Hathaway, An alternative approach to the teaching of systematic transition metal chemistry, Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 56, pp. 390–392 (1979)
- ↑ H. Bethe, Termaufspaltung in Kristallen [Term splitting in cystals], Annalen der Physik, Fünfte Folge, vol. 3, p. 133–206 (1929) Online. English translation: Selected Works of Hans Bethe, World Scientific, Singapore (1997) Google Books (online)