Fortran: Difference between revisions
imported>Paul Wormer No edit summary |
imported>Paul Wormer No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
From the end of the 1950s onward, many important computer language concepts were developed by the early [[computer science|computer scientists]], such as [[recursion (computer)|recursion]], dynamic storage allocation, local and global variables, if then else statements, etc. When at the end of the 1960s it was decided that a more modern form of Fortran was needed (that later came to be known as Fortran-77), there was much pressure from the side of (numerical) mathematicians and computer scientists to extend the language with such constructs. However, this was successfully resisted by programmers—mainly physical scientists and engineers—who feared that the new, more abstract concepts would erode Fortran's pragmatic, natural style. In addition, workers writing Fortran programs for numerically intensive applications were afraid that the introduction of the constructs would be at the expense of the numerical efficiency of the language. At that time very sophisticated Fortran optimizing compilers were used and it was feared that concepts as recursion would impede the optimization and slow down the programs considerably. In consequence, the Fortran-77 standard does not allow recursion, dynamic storage allocation, or local variables. It does, however, allow more extended "if statements" and "loop" structures than its predecessors. Also character handling facilities were introduced into Fortran-77. | From the end of the 1950s onward, many important computer language concepts were developed by the early [[computer science|computer scientists]], such as [[recursion (computer)|recursion]], dynamic storage allocation, local and global variables, if then else statements, etc. When at the end of the 1960s it was decided that a more modern form of Fortran was needed (that later came to be known as Fortran-77), there was much pressure from the side of (numerical) mathematicians and computer scientists to extend the language with such constructs. However, this was successfully resisted by programmers—mainly physical scientists and engineers—who feared that the new, more abstract concepts would erode Fortran's pragmatic, natural style. In addition, workers writing Fortran programs for numerically intensive applications were afraid that the introduction of the constructs would be at the expense of the numerical efficiency of the language. At that time very sophisticated Fortran optimizing compilers were used and it was feared that concepts as recursion would impede the optimization and slow down the programs considerably. In consequence, the Fortran-77 standard does not allow recursion, dynamic storage allocation, or local variables. It does, however, allow more extended "if statements" and "loop" structures than its predecessors. Also character handling facilities were introduced into Fortran-77. | ||
Fortran-90 that appeared during the early 1990s, allows recursion, dynamic storage allocation, case statements, and a construct that is reminiscent of [[object (computers)|object]]s used in object oriented languages, namely modules. Fortran-90 allows handling of arrays as one entity. | Fortran-90 that appeared during the early 1990s, allows recursion, dynamic storage allocation, case statements, and a construct that is reminiscent of [[object (computers)|object]]s used in object oriented languages, namely modules. Fortran-90 allows handling of arrays as one entity, which enables compilers to apply parallel processing on them. | ||
The latest standard, Fortran-2003, supports object-oriented and generic programming. | The latest standard, Fortran-2003, supports object-oriented and generic programming. | ||
It | It is not likely that Fortran-90 and Fortran-2003 are applied as widely as the earlier versions of the language. Many programmers in need of modern constructs as recursions, objects and their inheritance, etc., switched during the 1980s to [[C]], [[C++]], and variants of these languages. It remains to be seen if they will ever return to the modern forms of Fortran. In any case, by all sorts of measures<ref>[http://www.langpop.com Programming language popularity] Retrieved July 30, 2009</ref> Fortran lags far behind C, C++, and Java in popularity among programmers. However, in the specialized field of [[high performance computing]], where computing runs lasting days, or even weeks, are common, Fortran still is the major language. This is because traditionally the Fortran compilers have been—and still are—strong in the optimization of computationally intensive tasks. | ||
==Some features of the language prior to Fortran 90== | ==Some features of the language prior to Fortran 90== |
Revision as of 09:16, 1 August 2009
Fortran (Formula translation) is the oldest high-level computer language. It was the first computer language that gave priority to humans over computers, meaning that the early Fortran programmers did not have to know machine instructions, but instead could use statements that largely coincide with mathematical formulas.
Fortran being the oldest high-level computer language, there is an enormous legacy in the scientific and engineering communities of Fortran programs, some of them as large as a million statements. It has always been the primary language for intensive (super)computing tasks, such as weather and climate modeling, oil reservoir simulation, computational fluid dynamics, computational chemistry, computational economics, and computational physics. The existing body of Fortran programs being too large to rewrite into an other computer language in a finite amount of time, it is likely that Fortran is here to stay. This the more likely, because a very noticeable feature of all Fortran versions that have appeared to date is their "upward compatibility". In principle, a modern Fortran-2003 compiler can still translate a Fortran program written in, say, 1959 and prepare it to run on a present day computer.
The first version of the language was developed in 1954 by an IBM team lead by John Backus. This version, known as Fortran I, was mainly restricted to IBM computers (notably the IBM 704 that starting 1957 was delivered with a Fortran compiler). In 1958 a variant, known as Fortran II, was introduced that was soon also implemented by other computer vendors; it now became possible to transfer (Fortran) programs between computers with completely different instruction sets. The issue of portability of programs (possibility of transferral between computers of different architecture) was born. In 1966 the first standard endorsed by the American Standards Association (now ANSI) was established: Fortran-66. The idea of this standard being that a program that strictly adhered to it would be portable.
From the end of the 1950s onward, many important computer language concepts were developed by the early computer scientists, such as recursion, dynamic storage allocation, local and global variables, if then else statements, etc. When at the end of the 1960s it was decided that a more modern form of Fortran was needed (that later came to be known as Fortran-77), there was much pressure from the side of (numerical) mathematicians and computer scientists to extend the language with such constructs. However, this was successfully resisted by programmers—mainly physical scientists and engineers—who feared that the new, more abstract concepts would erode Fortran's pragmatic, natural style. In addition, workers writing Fortran programs for numerically intensive applications were afraid that the introduction of the constructs would be at the expense of the numerical efficiency of the language. At that time very sophisticated Fortran optimizing compilers were used and it was feared that concepts as recursion would impede the optimization and slow down the programs considerably. In consequence, the Fortran-77 standard does not allow recursion, dynamic storage allocation, or local variables. It does, however, allow more extended "if statements" and "loop" structures than its predecessors. Also character handling facilities were introduced into Fortran-77.
Fortran-90 that appeared during the early 1990s, allows recursion, dynamic storage allocation, case statements, and a construct that is reminiscent of objects used in object oriented languages, namely modules. Fortran-90 allows handling of arrays as one entity, which enables compilers to apply parallel processing on them.
The latest standard, Fortran-2003, supports object-oriented and generic programming.
It is not likely that Fortran-90 and Fortran-2003 are applied as widely as the earlier versions of the language. Many programmers in need of modern constructs as recursions, objects and their inheritance, etc., switched during the 1980s to C, C++, and variants of these languages. It remains to be seen if they will ever return to the modern forms of Fortran. In any case, by all sorts of measures[1] Fortran lags far behind C, C++, and Java in popularity among programmers. However, in the specialized field of high performance computing, where computing runs lasting days, or even weeks, are common, Fortran still is the major language. This is because traditionally the Fortran compilers have been—and still are—strong in the optimization of computationally intensive tasks.
Some features of the language prior to Fortran 90
As stated earlier, much old (written before the 1990s) Fortran code is still in use. It is therefore of interest to discuss some of the rules and features of the older versions of the language, many of which are still valid, even in the latest standard.
The majority of statements are simply assignment statements of the form
A = expression
where the expression on the right-hand side is first fully evaluated and then assigned to the variable named A.
Implicit typing
Fortran 77 introduced character data. Before that time Fortran only recognized real (floating point) numbers, integer numbers, and logicals (booleans). Names of variables have to begin with a letter. Only logicals (and in Fortran-77 characters) have to be declared explicitly. The real and integer variables are implicitly declared by the rule: all variables with names beginning with I, J, K, L, M, and N are integer, the variables of which the names start with the other letters are real.
The oldest Fortran variants only allowed variable names of maximally 6 characters, which gave rise to names as "CNVRG" for "convergence", "ITHR" for an integer threshold, etc. Moreover, formally the Fortran standard up to and including Fortran 77 prescribed capital letters.
Fixed format
Fortran-90 introduced free format, until that time Fortran statements had a fixed format. The fixed format of the statements is adapted to punch cards. The first column can contain the letter "C" indicating a comment card. Apart from the comment character, the first five columns of the card are either blank or contain a numeric label. The 6th column is preserved for a continuation character; if any non-blank character is in the 6th column, the statement is interpreted as the continuation of the previous statement. Column 7 through 72 contains the actual statement where blanks are completely ignored, they are optionally used to improve readability by humans. Statements are not closed by a semicolon or otherwise.
Change of execution flow
The oldest Fortran variants knew only the "arithmetic if". This is a statement of the form
IF (N) 10, 20, 30
where execution continues at the statements labeled 10, 20, or 30 for N <0 , N = 0 and N > 0, respectively. Labels contained in columns 1 through 5 can be any unique set of up to 5 digits.
Later the "logical if" was added that was usually used in conjunction with a "goto" statement, for example
IF (N .GE. M) GO TO 1234
If N ≥ M execution continues with the statement carrying the label 1234.
Fortran 77 knows the "if (a) then ... else ... endif" construct, where a is either true or false. This construct does not need labels, while prior to Fortran 77 programs were plagued by a proliferation of labels, making older Fortran programs very hard to read by humans.
Subroutines and functions
A Fortran program can be partitioned into smaller independent subprograms that at load/link time are combined to one executable program. The most common subprograms are "subroutines" that have a number of parameters that are input, output, or both. Also "functions", having input parameters and returning a single value, are possible. Functions are most commonly used for built-in subprograms provided by the vendor, such as sqrt (square root), etc.
Common blocks and blank commons
As stated, the older Fortran variants did not explicitly distinguish local and global variables. As a matter of fact, most compilers made local copies of variables, and kept arrays global.
To provide for global variables Fortran has "common blocks", either named or unnamed (blank). These are memory areas that are assigned to the executable program at load/link time. Each subroutine, in which the common block is declared, has read/write access to it. Because the common block is an independent programming unit, no information about it other than its starting address, is passed to subroutine accessing it. In other words, every subroutine makes its own assumptions about the length and the layout of the common block. It is needless to say that common blocks in the hands of careless programmers are almost infinite sources of confusion and programming errors.
Loops
The original form of the subscripted loop ("do loop") is
DO 10 I = M, N .... 10 (any executable statement)
The statements after the "do statement" up to and including the statement carrying the label 10 are executed, for I varying with unit steps from M to N. Prior to Fortran 77, the loop was executed at least once, even for M = N+1, i.e., the checking on the range of I was performed at the end of the loop cycle, not at the beginning. In the majority of cases this is not what the logic of the program dictates, so the older Fortran programs are full of constructs as
IF (M .GT. N) GO TO 20 DO 10 I = M, N .... 10 (any executable statement) 20 (any executable statement)
This was changed in Fortran 77, where by default the loop was skipped when M > N. This change was contrary to the "upward compatibility" philosophy of Fortran and therefore most compilers introduced a "single trip" flag to ask for at least a single trip through the loop, in accordance with the older standard. Forgetting to set the flag (or not knowing that it is necessary) can cause crashed runs, or even worse, (slightly) wrong results.
Arrays
Basically, arrays in the older Fortran versions are static and declared by a statement of the type
DIMENSION A(100,100), B(25)
meaning that A(I,J) gives access to an element of the square array A, provided 1 ≤ I ≤ 100 and 1 ≤ J ≤ 100 and B(K), 1 ≤ K ≤ 25, gives access to an element of the linear array B. Before Fortran-77 array indices had to be larger than 0. This restriction could be very cumbersome, because the index 0 appears naturally in many problems and the programmer had to shift the index by one, leading to confusion about the choice between ±1 shifts. In Fortran 77 upper and lower bounds of arrays are unrestricted.
Some features of Fortran-90
The next Fortran standard was for quite some known as Fortran-88 because it was expected 11 years after Fortran-77. However, the international standards committees dragged their feet[2] and the first compilers following the new and hotly debated standard (adopted 11 April, 1991)[3] started appearing soon after 1991.
In the meantime Fortran lost much ground in the wake of the downfall of IBM and the rise of UNIX workstations and the systems programming language C.
The main features of Fortran-90 are
- Free format source code form (column independent)
- Modern control structures such as CASE and DO WHILE
- Handling of whole arrays (array sections, array operators, etc.)
- Dynamic memory allocation
- Operator overloading
- Keyword argument passing to procedures
- The INTENT (in, out, inout) procedure argument attribute
- Control of numeric precision and range
- Modules - packages containing variable and code
References
- ↑ Programming language popularity Retrieved July 30, 2009
- ↑ See The Fortran saga by Brian Meek for a detailed story of the political fights around the establishment of the new standard
- ↑ Foreword by Michael Metcalf in: W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, B. P. Flannery: Numerical Recipes in Fortran 90. Cambridge University Press, 1999, ISBN 0-521-57439-0. Online
External link
(To be continued)