Preoperative care/Catalogs/Beta-blocker evidence table: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Robert Badgett No edit summary |
imported>Robert Badgett mNo edit summary |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| rowspan="2" align="center" | 0.8% | | rowspan="2" align="center" | 0.8% | ||
| rowspan="2" align="center" | 0.6% | | rowspan="2" align="center" | 0.6% | ||
| colspan="2" | Heart failure, clinically significant bradycardia or hypotension | | colspan="2" | Heart failure, clinically significant bradycardia or hypotension: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| align="center" | 0.6% | | align="center" | 0.6% | ||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| rowspan="4" bgcolor="red" align="center" | 1% | | rowspan="4" bgcolor="red" align="center" | 1% | ||
| rowspan="4" bgcolor="red" align="center" | 0.5% | | rowspan="4" bgcolor="red" align="center" | 0.5% | ||
| colspan="2" | Clinically significant hypotension | | colspan="2" | Clinically significant hypotension: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| align="center" | 3.1% | | align="center" | 3.1% | ||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
| rowspan="2" align="center" | 0.4% | | rowspan="2" align="center" | 0.4% | ||
| rowspan="2" align="center" | 0% | | rowspan="2" align="center" | 0% | ||
| colspan="2" | Hypotension reported as an ADR | | colspan="2" | Hypotension reported as an [[Adverse drug reaction|ADR]]: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| align="center" | 0.4% | | align="center" | 0.4% | ||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
| rowspan="2" align="center" | 2.0% <!--From their Table V --> | | rowspan="2" align="center" | 2.0% <!--From their Table V --> | ||
| rowspan="2" align="center" | 1.6% <!--From their Table V --> | | rowspan="2" align="center" | 1.6% <!--From their Table V --> | ||
| colspan="2" | Intraoperative hypotension treated | | colspan="2" | Intraoperative hypotension treated: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="red" align="center" | 46% | | bgcolor="red" align="center" | 46% | ||
Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
| rowspan="2" align="center" | 2% | | rowspan="2" align="center" | 2% | ||
| rowspan="2" align="center" | 0% | | rowspan="2" align="center" | 0% | ||
| colspan="2" | Intraoperative inotropes given | | colspan="2" | Intraoperative inotropes given: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="red" align="center" | 92% | | bgcolor="red" align="center" | 92% | ||
Line 118: | Line 118: | ||
| rowspan="2" align="center" bgcolor="lime" | 17.0 | | rowspan="2" align="center" bgcolor="lime" | 17.0 | ||
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" | Not reported | | rowspan="2" colspan="2" | Not reported | ||
| colspan="2" valign="top" | Discontinuation of study drug due to | | colspan="2" valign="top" | Discontinuation of study drug due to [[Adverse drug reaction|ADR]]s: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| align="center" |0% | | align="center" |0% | ||
Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
| rowspan="2" align="center" |4%<ref name="pmid9447850">{{cite journal |author=Wallace A, Layug B, Tateo I, ''et al.'' |title=Prophylactic atenolol reduces postoperative myocardial ischemia. McSPI Research Group |journal=Anesthesiology |volume=88 |issue=1 |pages=7–17 |year=1998 |month=January |pmid=9447850 |doi= |url=http://meta.wkhealth.com/pt/pt-core/template-journal/lwwgateway/media/landingpage.htm?issn=0003-3022&volume=88&issue=1&spage=7 |issn=}}</ref> | | rowspan="2" align="center" |4%<ref name="pmid9447850">{{cite journal |author=Wallace A, Layug B, Tateo I, ''et al.'' |title=Prophylactic atenolol reduces postoperative myocardial ischemia. McSPI Research Group |journal=Anesthesiology |volume=88 |issue=1 |pages=7–17 |year=1998 |month=January |pmid=9447850 |doi= |url=http://meta.wkhealth.com/pt/pt-core/template-journal/lwwgateway/media/landingpage.htm?issn=0003-3022&volume=88&issue=1&spage=7 |issn=}}</ref> | ||
| rowspan="2" align="center" |1%<ref name="pmid9447850"/> | | rowspan="2" align="center" |1%<ref name="pmid9447850"/> | ||
| colspan="2" | Intraoperative inotropes given<ref name="pmid9447850"/> | | colspan="2" | Intraoperative inotropes given:<ref name="pmid9447850"/> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| align="center" |13% | | align="center" |13% |
Revision as of 19:54, 27 August 2009
Patients | Intervention | Comparison | Outcome | Results | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mortality | Stroke | Beta-blocker toxicity | ||||||||
Rx | Control | Rx | Control | Rx | Control | |||||
Decrease IV[1] |
1066 patients: • < 1% vascular surgery • RCRI = 2: 100% |
Bisoprolol • Started a median of 34 days preop • Minimum allowed HR*: >50 bpm |
Open label | Mortality at 30 days | 1.9% | 3.0% | 0.8% | 0.6% | Heart failure, clinically significant bradycardia or hypotension: | |
0.6% | 0.4% | |||||||||
POISE[2] 2008 Partially funded by AstraZeneca |
8351 patients: • 42% vascular surgery • RCRI = 2: uncertain |
Metoprolol succinate • Started day of surgery • Minimum allowed HR*: > 50 bpm |
Placebo | Mortality at two weeks | Overall | 1% | 0.5% | Clinically significant hypotension: | ||
3.1% | 2.3% | 15% | 9.7% | |||||||
Vascular pts | ||||||||||
Significant benefit on composite events. Mortality by surgery type not reported. | ||||||||||
BBSA[3] 2007 Partially funded by industry. |
224 patients: • 1% vascular surgery • RCRI = 2: uncertain |
Bisoprolol • Started day of surgery Minimum allowed HR*: > 50bpm |
Placebo | Mortality at one year | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.8% | 0% | Hypotension: | |
0% | 2.7% | |||||||||
DIPOM[4] 2006 Partially funded by AstraZeneca |
921 patients: • 7% vascular surgery • RCRI > 2: uncertain • All had diabetes |
Metoprolol succinate • Started 0-1 days preop • Minimum allowed HR*: >55 bpm |
Placebo | Mortality at a median of 18 months | 16% | 16% | 0.4% | 0% | Hypotension reported as an ADR: | |
0.4% | 0.2% | |||||||||
MaVS[5] 2006 No industry funding. |
496 patients: • 100% vascular surgery • RCRI = 2: 40% |
Metoprolol • Start: day of surgery • Minimum allowed HR*: > 50 bpm while awake; >45 bpm while asleep. |
Placebo | Hospital mortality | 0% | 1.6% | 2.0% | 1.6% | Intraoperative hypotension treated: | |
46% | 34% | |||||||||
POBBLE[6] 2005 No industry funding. |
103 patients: • 100% vascular surgery • RCRI > 2: uncertain |
Metoprolol • Start with test dose one day preop • Minimum allowed HR*: > 50 bpm |
Placebo (anesthesiologists were not blinded) | Mortality at 30 days | 3% | 1% | 2% | 0% | Intraoperative inotropes given: | |
92% | 64% | |||||||||
Decrease[7] 1999 Uncertain funding. |
112 patients: • 100% vascular surgery • RCRI = 2: uncertain, at least 67% • Abnl stress echo: 100% |
Bisoprolol • Started a median of 37 days preop • Minimum allowed HR*: > 50 bpm |
Open label | Mortality at 30 days | 3.4 | 17.0 | Not reported | Discontinuation of study drug due to ADRs: | ||
0% | 0% | |||||||||
Mangano/ MSPI[8] 1996 No industry funding. |
200 patients: • 41% vascular surgery • RCRI > 2: uncertain |
Atenolol • Minimum allowed HR*: > 55 bpm |
Placebo | Hospital mortality | 4% | 2% | 4%[9] | 1%[9] | Intraoperative inotropes given:[9] | |
13% | 13% | |||||||||
* Minimum allowed HR. The lowest heart rate allowed before beta-blockers were withheld.
|
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Dunkelgrun M, Boersma E, Schouten O, et al. (June 2009). "Bisoprolol and fluvastatin for the reduction of perioperative cardiac mortality and myocardial infarction in intermediate-risk patients undergoing noncardiovascular surgery: a randomized controlled trial (DECREASE-IV)". Ann. Surg. 249 (6): 921–6. DOI:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a77d00. PMID 19474688. Research Blogging.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Devereaux PJ, Yang H, Yusuf S, et al. (May 2008). "Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomised controlled trial". Lancet 371 (9627): 1839–47. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60601-7. PMID 18479744. Research Blogging.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Zaugg M, Bestmann L, Wacker J, et al. (July 2007). "Adrenergic receptor genotype but not perioperative bisoprolol therapy may determine cardiovascular outcome in at-risk patients undergoing surgery with spinal block: the Swiss Beta Blocker in Spinal Anesthesia (BBSA) study: a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial with 1-year follow-up". Anesthesiology 107 (1): 33–44. DOI:10.1097/01.anes.0000267530.62344.a4. PMID 17585213. Research Blogging.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Juul AB, Wetterslev J, Gluud C, et al. (June 2006). "Effect of perioperative beta blockade in patients with diabetes undergoing major non-cardiac surgery: randomised placebo controlled, blinded multicentre trial". BMJ 332 (7556): 1482. DOI:10.1136/bmj.332.7556.1482. PMID 16793810. PMC 1482337. Research Blogging.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 Yang H, Raymer K, Butler R, Parlow J, Roberts R (November 2006). "The effects of perioperative beta-blockade: results of the Metoprolol after Vascular Surgery (MaVS) study, a randomized controlled trial". Am. Heart J. 152 (5): 983–90. DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2006.07.024. PMID 17070177. Research Blogging.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Brady AR, Gibbs JS, Greenhalgh RM, Powell JT, Sydes MR (April 2005). "Perioperative beta-blockade (POBBLE) for patients undergoing infrarenal vascular surgery: results of a randomized double-blind controlled trial". J. Vasc. Surg. 41 (4): 602–9. DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2005.01.048. PMID 15874923. Research Blogging.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Poldermans D, Boersma E, Bax JJ, et al. (December 1999). "The effect of bisoprolol on perioperative mortality and myocardial infarction in high-risk patients undergoing vascular surgery. Dutch Echocardiographic Cardiac Risk Evaluation Applying Stress Echocardiography Study Group". N. Engl. J. Med. 341 (24): 1789–94. PMID 10588963. [e]
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Mangano DT, Layug EL, Wallace A, Tateo I (December 1996). "Effect of atenolol on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity after noncardiac surgery. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group". N. Engl. J. Med. 335 (23): 1713–20. PMID 8929262. [e]
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 Wallace A, Layug B, Tateo I, et al. (January 1998). "Prophylactic atenolol reduces postoperative myocardial ischemia. McSPI Research Group". Anesthesiology 88 (1): 7–17. PMID 9447850. [e]