Talk:Applied statistics: Difference between revisions
imported>Nick Gardner |
imported>Nick Gardner |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
My thanks for help with definitions - and I look forward to further initiatives from mathematicians in creating further definitions. | My thanks for help with definitions - and I look forward to further initiatives from mathematicians in creating further definitions. | ||
I would point out, however, that a definition that contains undefined terms is unhelpful. The current defimition of "sample" is a case in point. In my opinion it cannot be allowed to stand. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 06:00, 30 June 2009 (UTC) | I would point out, however, that a definition that contains undefined terms is unhelpful. The current defimition of "sample" is a case in point. In my opinion it cannot be allowed to stand. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 06:00, 30 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
I should like to add a note to the glossary title on the Related Articles subpage to the effect that for mathematically precise explanations of the concepts, the reader should refer to the [[Statistics theory]] article. This does not seem helpful in the present state of that article, but perhaps I should do so in anticipation of its further development? [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 10:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:53, 30 June 2009
Help welcomed
My personal experience of this subject does not extend beyond economic statistics and quality control, so I should welcome inputs that put me right on other aspects. Also, I have had no mathematical training beyond the basic necessities of a professional engineer, so a mathematical input for the same purpose would also be welcome. By way of explanation of my drafting I should explain that I have in mind a readership of graduates and undergraduates that are neither statisticians nor mathematicians but may want to use statistics in their work or leisure. In view of the magnitude of the subject, I am trying to touch briefly upon most aspects, but long enough only to convey its flavour and provide links to authoritative references. I think that my cautionary notes in the text are justified by the damage done by the misuse of statistics, especially by my mathematical fellow-economists and their dramatic misapplication of statistics to financial risk assessment. Nick Gardner 14:46, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
My thanks for help with definitions - and I look forward to further initiatives from mathematicians in creating further definitions. I would point out, however, that a definition that contains undefined terms is unhelpful. The current defimition of "sample" is a case in point. In my opinion it cannot be allowed to stand. Nick Gardner 06:00, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
I should like to add a note to the glossary title on the Related Articles subpage to the effect that for mathematically precise explanations of the concepts, the reader should refer to the Statistics theory article. This does not seem helpful in the present state of that article, but perhaps I should do so in anticipation of its further development? Nick Gardner 10:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Article with Definition
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Engineering Developing Articles
- Engineering Nonstub Articles
- Engineering Internal Articles
- Economics Developing Articles
- Economics Nonstub Articles
- Economics Internal Articles
- Mathematics Developing Articles
- Mathematics Nonstub Articles
- Mathematics Internal Articles