Talk:Non-Borel set: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Peter Schmitt (→Some remarks: new section) |
imported>Boris Tsirelson (→Suggestion: Create "Related Articles" subpage: question) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Other than that, you seem to have learned the CZ style quite well. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 23:55, 20 June 2009 (UTC) | Other than that, you seem to have learned the CZ style quite well. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 23:55, 20 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
:A question. The related articles are already linked from the article. Should they be linked again from "Related Articles"? And if you answer "yes" then I have another question: some of these are for now non-existent articles; should they also be included into "Related Articles"? | |||
:By the way, I am astonished to see "Elementary function" a subtopic of "Logarithm". Indeed, the logarithm is just one of the elementary functions; why "subtopic"? [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 05:35, 21 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Some remarks == | == Some remarks == | ||
Revision as of 23:35, 20 June 2009
 |
NOTICE, please do not remove from top of page. |
| WP article "Non-Borel set", version of 23 Aug 2008, was used. I am its sole author. | |
| Boris Tsirelson |
Suggestion: Create "Related Articles" subpage
Hi, Boris. The only suggestion I have is that you should create the "Related Articles" subpage:
- When you click on the "Related Articles" tab just above, you will see the instructions on how to do it.
- As an example, you could look at Logarithm/Related Articles
Other than that, you seem to have learned the CZ style quite well. Milton Beychok 23:55, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- A question. The related articles are already linked from the article. Should they be linked again from "Related Articles"? And if you answer "yes" then I have another question: some of these are for now non-existent articles; should they also be included into "Related Articles"?
- By the way, I am astonished to see "Elementary function" a subtopic of "Logarithm". Indeed, the logarithm is just one of the elementary functions; why "subtopic"? Boris Tsirelson 05:35, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Some remarks
I think it would be better to merge this with Borel set (which is not more than a stub). An article about Borel sets should also tell about non-Borel sets.
In my opinion (I do not know if this is a general opinion) this article does not need a link to "simple" topics like divisor, etc. It necessarily addresses readers who should know this.
The "Advanced" subpage only contains one sentence and a reference -- that could/should be moved to the article.
Peter Schmitt 00:11, 21 June 2009 (UTC)