Talk:Set theory/Draft: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Boris Tsirelson No edit summary |
imported>Boris Tsirelson (probably approvable but) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::Are you sure the world needs nothing else? :-) [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 07:57, 9 May 2010 (UTC) | ::Are you sure the world needs nothing else? :-) [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 07:57, 9 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
Probably this article is approvable. For now I am not ready to approve it, because some finer points are beyond my competence. I understand the given text about that, but I have no other sources to be sure. Namely: | |||
*"An ingenious axiom of Goedel's, Limitation of Size"; | |||
*"Montague proved in 1961 that ZF cannot be finitely axiomatised"; | |||
*"NF ... is finitely axiomatisable"; | |||
*"NFU, whose consistency is implied by that of simple type theory". | |||
[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 08:19, 18 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:19, 18 May 2010
Nice work! Boris Tsirelson 18:22, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks! I only joined CZ because I thought the world needed a decent introductory account of set theory :-) Mark Wainwright 04:22, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- Are you sure the world needs nothing else? :-) Boris Tsirelson 07:57, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Probably this article is approvable. For now I am not ready to approve it, because some finer points are beyond my competence. I understand the given text about that, but I have no other sources to be sure. Namely:
- "An ingenious axiom of Goedel's, Limitation of Size";
- "Montague proved in 1961 that ZF cannot be finitely axiomatised";
- "NF ... is finitely axiomatisable";
- "NFU, whose consistency is implied by that of simple type theory".
Boris Tsirelson 08:19, 18 May 2010 (UTC)