Ex Parte Endo: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Shamira Gelbman (more intro) |
imported>Shamira Gelbman (outline) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
'''''Ex Parte Mitsuye Endo''''', 323 U.S. 283 (1944), was the last of four United States Supreme Court cases dealing with the [[Japanese Internment]] during [[World War II]]. In contrast to the others, the Court ruled against the internment measure that was challenged in this case -- an especially ironic outcome insofar as the decision was rendered on the same day as the ''[[Korematsu v. United States]]'' ruling, which upheld a Japanese exclusion order. | '''''Ex Parte Mitsuye Endo''''', 323 U.S. 283 (1944), was the last of four United States Supreme Court cases dealing with the [[Japanese Internment]] during [[World War II]]. In contrast to the others, the Court ruled against the internment measure that was challenged in this case -- an especially ironic outcome insofar as the decision was rendered on the same day as the ''[[Korematsu v. United States]]'' ruling, which upheld a Japanese exclusion order. | ||
== Facts of the case == | |||
== Ruling == | |||
=== Opinion of the Court === | |||
=== Concurring and dissenting opinions === | |||
== Significance and implications == | |||
Revision as of 19:31, 15 April 2009
Ex Parte Mitsuye Endo, 323 U.S. 283 (1944), was the last of four United States Supreme Court cases dealing with the Japanese Internment during World War II. In contrast to the others, the Court ruled against the internment measure that was challenged in this case -- an especially ironic outcome insofar as the decision was rendered on the same day as the Korematsu v. United States ruling, which upheld a Japanese exclusion order.