Extraordinary rendition, U.S.: Difference between revisions
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz mNo edit summary |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
{{TOC-right}} | |||
{{main|Extraordinary rendition}} | {{main|Extraordinary rendition}} | ||
{{seealso|Extraordinary rendition, U.S., George W. Bush Administration}} | {{seealso|Extraordinary rendition, U.S., George W. Bush Administration}} | ||
| Line 6: | Line 7: | ||
| contribution = USAM Chapter 9-15.000, International Extradition and Related Matters | | contribution = USAM Chapter 9-15.000, International Extradition and Related Matters | ||
| publisher = [[U.S. Department of Justice]] | | publisher = [[U.S. Department of Justice]] | ||
| url = }}</ref> This is a form of [[extrajudicial detention]], although the process may or may not involve a hearing in the country involved. If the U.S. requested a country to deport a citizen of a third country, in transit through the second country, the second country could hold an administrative deportation hearing, as distinct from a judicial one. | | url = }}</ref> This is a form of [[extrajudicial detention]], although the process may or may not involve a hearing in the country involved. If the U.S. requested a country to deport a citizen of a third country, in transit through the second country, the second country could hold an administrative deportation hearing, as distinct from a judicial one. Contrary to some news reports, the practice was not limited to the [[George W. Bush Administration]]. | ||
One of the rationales for avoiding [[international extradition]] is that the matter may involve | In some cases, the rendition was to the U.S. proper. In others, U.S. personnel assisted agents of other countries to apprehend and render people in third countries, with U.S. assistance in the operation but the individual never being under full U.S. custody. | ||
==Policy and legal context== | |||
One of the rationales for avoiding [[international extradition]] is that the matter may involve the [[state secrets privilege]], upheld by the [[U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit]] in [[el-Masri v. Tenet]]. | |||
A relevant treaty obligation is that from the [[Convention against Torture]], which contains a doctrine called ''refoulement'', which forbids a country from sending a person to a country where there is a substantial chance he might be tortured. | |||
==Clinton Administration== | |||
Michael Scheuer, a former [[CIA]] specialist in counterterrorism, worked on developing rendition as a part of [[Bill Clinton|Clinton Administration]] doctrine in the mid-1990s. In an interview with the ''New Yorker'', Scheuer, said “It was begun in desperation, ” intended to “detect, disrupt, and dismantle” terrorist operations, principally directed at [[al-Qaeda]], with broad but nonspecific approval at the White House level; Scheuer cites [[Richard Clarke]] as giving a general "Figure it out by yourselves", although Clarke declined to talk to the author. | |||
According to Scheuer, the first partner was to be Egypt, on the basis that it had the capability to track, capture and transport suspects. He said “What was clever was that some of the senior people in Al Qaeda were Egyptian,” (i.e., [[Egyptian Islamic Jihad]] as an organization and [[Ayman al-Zawahiri]] as a key target. “It served American purposes to get these people arrested, and Egyptian purposes to get these people back, where they could be interrogated.” Scheuer said that the U.S. carried out its obligations to avoid the ''refoulement'' doctrine, but told the interviewer he was "not sure" if there was a written agreement not to [[torture]]. <ref name=NYker2005-12>{{citation | |||
| url = http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2005/02/14/050214fa_fact6?printable=true | |||
| title = Outsourcing Torture: The secret history of America’s “extraordinary rendition” program | |||
| author = Jane Mayer |date = February 14, 2005 | journal = New Yorker}}</ref> | |||
==George W. Bush Administration== | |||
{{main|Extraordinary rendition, U.S., George W. Bush Administration}} | |||
==Obama Administration== | |||
The policy of the [[Obama administration]] has not been fully elaborated, although this Administration has taken a strong policy against torture. | The policy of the [[Obama administration]] has not been fully elaborated, although this Administration has taken a strong policy against torture. | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
Revision as of 20:00, 1 April 2009
As has been practiced by the United States government, captives are transferred from US custody without going through the regular channels of international extradition. [1] This is a form of extrajudicial detention, although the process may or may not involve a hearing in the country involved. If the U.S. requested a country to deport a citizen of a third country, in transit through the second country, the second country could hold an administrative deportation hearing, as distinct from a judicial one. Contrary to some news reports, the practice was not limited to the George W. Bush Administration.
In some cases, the rendition was to the U.S. proper. In others, U.S. personnel assisted agents of other countries to apprehend and render people in third countries, with U.S. assistance in the operation but the individual never being under full U.S. custody.
Policy and legal context
One of the rationales for avoiding international extradition is that the matter may involve the state secrets privilege, upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in el-Masri v. Tenet.
A relevant treaty obligation is that from the Convention against Torture, which contains a doctrine called refoulement, which forbids a country from sending a person to a country where there is a substantial chance he might be tortured.
Clinton Administration
Michael Scheuer, a former CIA specialist in counterterrorism, worked on developing rendition as a part of Clinton Administration doctrine in the mid-1990s. In an interview with the New Yorker, Scheuer, said “It was begun in desperation, ” intended to “detect, disrupt, and dismantle” terrorist operations, principally directed at al-Qaeda, with broad but nonspecific approval at the White House level; Scheuer cites Richard Clarke as giving a general "Figure it out by yourselves", although Clarke declined to talk to the author.
According to Scheuer, the first partner was to be Egypt, on the basis that it had the capability to track, capture and transport suspects. He said “What was clever was that some of the senior people in Al Qaeda were Egyptian,” (i.e., Egyptian Islamic Jihad as an organization and Ayman al-Zawahiri as a key target. “It served American purposes to get these people arrested, and Egyptian purposes to get these people back, where they could be interrogated.” Scheuer said that the U.S. carried out its obligations to avoid the refoulement doctrine, but told the interviewer he was "not sure" if there was a written agreement not to torture. [2]
George W. Bush Administration
Obama Administration
The policy of the Obama administration has not been fully elaborated, although this Administration has taken a strong policy against torture.
References
- ↑ , USAM Chapter 9-15.000, International Extradition and Related Matters, US Attorneys' Criminal Resource Manual, U.S. Department of Justice
- ↑ Jane Mayer (February 14, 2005), "Outsourcing Torture: The secret history of America’s “extraordinary rendition” program", New Yorker