Talk:Taxonomy of Archaea domain: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Chris Day
imported>Chris Day
Line 5: Line 5:
Just wandering if this article should be a subpage of Archaea or it is better to stand by itself. [[User:Dalton Holland Baptista|Dalton Holland Baptista]] 03:23, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Just wandering if this article should be a subpage of Archaea or it is better to stand by itself. [[User:Dalton Holland Baptista|Dalton Holland Baptista]] 03:23, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


:I was wondering the same thing. I have no easy answer and i could see this article being quite interesting.  Although the list itself should probably be a catalog or maintained as masterlists, similar to [[Leptotes/Related Articles/Masterlist]]. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 03:26, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
:I was wondering the same thing. I have no easy answer and i could see this article being quite interesting.  Although the list itself should probably be a catalog or maintained as masterlists, similar to [[Leptotes/Related Articles/Masterlist]].
 
:In short now that we actually have several writers interested in taxonomy we could probably work out our own system. So feel free to experiment with different ideas and see what works best.  This project is young enough that we are not yet fixed into a particular format or style. To coin a phrase, "the world is your oyster". [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 03:26, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:29, 2 March 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  Is a taxonomic list of Archaea domain based on Garrity et al. (2007) and Euzeby (2008). [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category:  Biology [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

Opinion needed

Just wandering if this article should be a subpage of Archaea or it is better to stand by itself. Dalton Holland Baptista 03:23, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

I was wondering the same thing. I have no easy answer and i could see this article being quite interesting. Although the list itself should probably be a catalog or maintained as masterlists, similar to Leptotes/Related Articles/Masterlist.
In short now that we actually have several writers interested in taxonomy we could probably work out our own system. So feel free to experiment with different ideas and see what works best. This project is young enough that we are not yet fixed into a particular format or style. To coin a phrase, "the world is your oyster". Chris Day 03:26, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Taxonomy_of_Archaea_domain&oldid=589374"