Talk:N-Ray: Difference between revisions
imported>Pierre-Alain Gouanvic m (→So this would be pseudoskepticism?: signature) |
imported>George Swan |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[User:Pierre-Alain Gouanvic|Pierre-Alain Gouanvic]] 13:55, 25 June 2008 (CDT) | [[User:Pierre-Alain Gouanvic|Pierre-Alain Gouanvic]] 13:55, 25 June 2008 (CDT) | ||
:I started an article on [[polywater]] as well. | |||
:Cheers! [[User:George Swan|George Swan]] 07:06, 26 June 2008 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 06:06, 26 June 2008
|
| Metadata here |
So this would be pseudoskepticism?
Hi George Swan,
If this is what I think it is, congratulations for bringing this up!
If I get this well, properly conducted experiments demonstrated the existence of something quite unusual, even spooky, which "competed" with X-rays, which were all the rage (I guess), and then a skeptic (Wood) from a leading scientific journal (Nature) came to reestablish the status quo by using fraud.
Today, it is difficult to bring N-rays back in the spotlight because most scientist cannot afford to be associated to so-called pseudoscience... although the scientific fraud was perpetrated by a respected pseudoskeptic.
This would merit a place in the Core controversial topics billboard. But tell me please if I'm mistaken!
Pierre-Alain Gouanvic 13:55, 25 June 2008 (CDT)
- I started an article on polywater as well.
- Cheers! George Swan 07:06, 26 June 2008 (CDT)