Talk:Director of National Intelligence: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(New page: {{subpages}})
 
(Should this article be kept or deleted?)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
==Should this article be kept or deleted?==
A deletion proposal was placed on this article on 2024-03-16, without, however offering any explanation as to the concerns that triggered it.
A third party might guess it was one or more of the following... because:
# It hadn't been edited since 2011, and was out of date...
# It was entirely the work of Howard Berkowitz, and, although he was a trusted editor, at the time, experience has shown the quality of his work could be extremely uneven.
Well, should this article be deleted?
I don't think so.
Director of National Intelligence  is, I believe, a cabinet level position, so I don't think anyone could reasonably claim the office isn't important enough figure to justify an article.
In General I would argue against strongly deleting material merely because Howard wrote it.
Candidly, [[User:George Swan|George Swan]] ([[User talk:George Swan|talk]]) 21:51, 20 April 2024 (CDT)

Revision as of 20:52, 20 April 2024

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Prior to the attacks of 9/11, the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency was the nominal head of the United States Intelligence Community, following 9/11 a more senior position was created, with a measure of actual authority over those agencies [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories history, military and law [Please add or review categories]
 Subgroup category:  Intelligence
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Should this article be kept or deleted?

A deletion proposal was placed on this article on 2024-03-16, without, however offering any explanation as to the concerns that triggered it.

A third party might guess it was one or more of the following... because:

  1. It hadn't been edited since 2011, and was out of date...
  2. It was entirely the work of Howard Berkowitz, and, although he was a trusted editor, at the time, experience has shown the quality of his work could be extremely uneven.

Well, should this article be deleted?

I don't think so.

Director of National Intelligence is, I believe, a cabinet level position, so I don't think anyone could reasonably claim the office isn't important enough figure to justify an article.

In General I would argue against strongly deleting material merely because Howard wrote it.

Candidly, George Swan (talk) 21:51, 20 April 2024 (CDT)