CZ:Editorial Council Resolution 0010/Member position statements: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards
Line 4: Line 4:
# '''[[User:Supten Sarbadhikari|Supten Sarbadhikari]]:''' This proposal is supposed to only adopt the "[[CZ:Proposals/Romanization]]" in principle. That, in turn, will be guided by the policy stated there. Therefore, all the members who wish to modify those may do so at the respective talk pages and also further when [[User:John_Stephenson|John Stephenson]] forms the designated group for its implementation. The discussions on Resolution 0010 should only state arguments in favor or against adopting the said proposal in principle.
# '''[[User:Supten Sarbadhikari|Supten Sarbadhikari]]:''' This proposal is supposed to only adopt the "[[CZ:Proposals/Romanization]]" in principle. That, in turn, will be guided by the policy stated there. Therefore, all the members who wish to modify those may do so at the respective talk pages and also further when [[User:John_Stephenson|John Stephenson]] forms the designated group for its implementation. The discussions on Resolution 0010 should only state arguments in favor or against adopting the said proposal in principle.


#'''[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 18:06, 15 May 2008 (CDT)''' There is a lack of clarity concerning the relation between this proposal and Naming Conventions policy on CZ. Some discussion on the transliteration of non-Latin names has taken place on the Talk page of [[Osama bin Laden]] and was not resolved, other than the claim (by some) that the most common contemporary transliterated form should be used. I am not convinced that this is necessary or desirable on a wiki (whereas it clearly is in a printed encyclopedia) since we can easily redirect. Furthermore, the function of an encyclopedia is to educate rather than reproduce popular misconceptions and errors. Given that the [[Naming Conventions]] has not been approved by the Editorial Council, I propose that we put Resolution 0010 temporarily on hold and formalise the Naming Conventions as another resolution. Thus, the content of the Naming Conventions has to be discussed before we can accept it as shaping the content of this Resolution. I think that's easier, and fomally more correct,  than quickly trying to reformulate this Resolution.
#'''[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]]''' There is a lack of clarity concerning the relation between this proposal and Naming Conventions policy on CZ. Some discussion on the transliteration of non-Latin names has taken place on the Talk page of [[Osama bin Laden]] and was not resolved, other than the claim (by some) that the most common contemporary transliterated form should be used. I am not convinced that this is necessary or desirable on a wiki (whereas it clearly is in a printed encyclopedia) since we can easily redirect. Furthermore, the function of an encyclopedia is to educate rather than reproduce popular misconceptions and errors. Given that the [[CZ:Naming_Conventions]] has not been approved by the Editorial Council, I propose that we put Resolution 0010 temporarily on hold and formalise the Naming Conventions as another resolution. Thus, the content of the Naming Conventions has to be discussed before we can accept it as shaping the content of this Resolution. I think that's easier, and fomally more correct,  than quickly trying to reformulate this Resolution.




{{Editorial Council}}
{{Editorial Council}}

Revision as of 17:10, 15 May 2008

Rules

This page contains the official positions of Citizendium Editorial Council Members about Editorial Council Resolution 0010.

The governing rules for discussion are found at Editorial Council Rules of Procedure. The following are reminders.

  • Council Members should place their comments, limited to 600 words maximum, underneath their names on this page. Comments will be ordered based on when they first appeared on this page; new comments should simply be appended to the bottom.
  • Members may edit their comments throughout the discussion period.
  • Each Member will be required to read this page before voting.
  • This page will be closed for editing when voting begins.
  • The closing date for position statements can be found on the resolution page and will be announced on cz-editcouncil, followed by reminders. Note that Members may move to extend discussion.

Original Member position statements

  1. Supten Sarbadhikari: This proposal is supposed to only adopt the "CZ:Proposals/Romanization" in principle. That, in turn, will be guided by the policy stated there. Therefore, all the members who wish to modify those may do so at the respective talk pages and also further when John Stephenson forms the designated group for its implementation. The discussions on Resolution 0010 should only state arguments in favor or against adopting the said proposal in principle.
  1. Martin Baldwin-Edwards There is a lack of clarity concerning the relation between this proposal and Naming Conventions policy on CZ. Some discussion on the transliteration of non-Latin names has taken place on the Talk page of Osama bin Laden and was not resolved, other than the claim (by some) that the most common contemporary transliterated form should be used. I am not convinced that this is necessary or desirable on a wiki (whereas it clearly is in a printed encyclopedia) since we can easily redirect. Furthermore, the function of an encyclopedia is to educate rather than reproduce popular misconceptions and errors. Given that the CZ:Naming_Conventions has not been approved by the Editorial Council, I propose that we put Resolution 0010 temporarily on hold and formalise the Naming Conventions as another resolution. Thus, the content of the Naming Conventions has to be discussed before we can accept it as shaping the content of this Resolution. I think that's easier, and fomally more correct, than quickly trying to reformulate this Resolution.


The Editorial Council was merged with the Management Council into a single governing body in 2013. All EC rules and decisions were upheld
except where they contradicted the merger. The following links are to archived and out-of-date pages:
Mailing List ArchivesResolutionsLogEssential PolicyRules of ProcedureHow to Make a Resolution