Talk:Semantic Web: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Blake Willmarth
(reply to HCB)
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:


: I'm not sure what your mechanical observation referred to, and if we did it correctly or not. [[User:Blake Willmarth|Blake Willmarth]] 04:14, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
: I'm not sure what your mechanical observation referred to, and if we did it correctly or not. [[User:Blake Willmarth|Blake Willmarth]] 04:14, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
::My observation meant you did something wise: starting with an article that had the proper CZ formatting rather than fight the learning curve. Your efforts, which are appreciated, went into adding meaningful content. Thanks! 04:47, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:47, 12 August 2010

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Tim Berners-Lee's concept of a "web of knowledge", whereby web-based document contents would be annotated and classified so that computers can parse the classifications and provide search results based on the semantic information (what the content means), rather than simply on matching of text strings. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Computers and Library_and_Information_Science [Please add or review categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Excellent Eduzendium work

I'm enjoying the added content in this article, and learning from it

A mechanical observation: starting from an existing stub that has all the CZ metadata and overhead in place, a standard lede, etc., may be a very promising way to do Eduzendium.

If you can split the code lines so they don't have to scroll horizontally, that would be desirable, but I don't know if the example is allowed to split to multiple lines. Howard C. Berkowitz 18:28, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! I followed your advice on line-splitting (the syntax is okay) and tried to simplify some of the language. There's still some cleaning up to do before tomorrow evening (due date). I can understand if CZ editors may wish to move off some of the technical stuff to separate pages, we just wanted to cover a bit of everything.
I'm not sure what your mechanical observation referred to, and if we did it correctly or not. Blake Willmarth 04:14, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
My observation meant you did something wise: starting with an article that had the proper CZ formatting rather than fight the learning curve. Your efforts, which are appreciated, went into adding meaningful content. Thanks! 04:47, 13 August 2010 (UTC)