Talk:S (letter): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ro Thorpe (→Audio) |
imported>Stephen Ewen No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:Hmmm. It would maybe even be better to provide audio of the entire articles being read. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 23:11, 10 March 2008 (CDT) | :Hmmm. It would maybe even be better to provide audio of the entire articles being read. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 23:11, 10 March 2008 (CDT) | ||
::Yes, that would be very nice, I am flattered! It does, however, raise the issue of British and American. The reader would have to have a command of those two varieties at least, along with an understanding of the accent system. But with the right amount of discussion, I think it could be done very effectively. [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 10:11, 11 March 2008 (CDT) | ::Yes, that would be very nice, I am flattered! It does, however, raise the issue of British and American. The reader would have to have a command of those two varieties at least, along with an understanding of the accent system. But with the right amount of discussion, I think it could be done very effectively. [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 10:11, 11 March 2008 (CDT) | ||
:::The most straightforward way to handle that is...record a version for each. :-) [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 11:01, 11 March 2008 (CDT) |
Revision as of 10:01, 11 March 2008
Audio
Ro, it occurs to me that this whole series of articles might be benefited by audio clips. Stephen Ewen 20:42, 10 March 2008 (CDT)
- I could totally record them!!!!!!! --Robert W King 21:10, 10 March 2008 (CDT)
- Hmmm. It would maybe even be better to provide audio of the entire articles being read. Stephen Ewen 23:11, 10 March 2008 (CDT)
- Yes, that would be very nice, I am flattered! It does, however, raise the issue of British and American. The reader would have to have a command of those two varieties at least, along with an understanding of the accent system. But with the right amount of discussion, I think it could be done very effectively. Ro Thorpe 10:11, 11 March 2008 (CDT)
- The most straightforward way to handle that is...record a version for each. :-) Stephen Ewen 11:01, 11 March 2008 (CDT)