Talk:Market (economics): Difference between revisions
imported>Nick Gardner |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I have set up a framework for an article that readers could use as an introduction to the concept and as a gateway to a range of more specialised articles. Comments and contributions are invited. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 09:30, 26 October 2010 (UTC) | I have set up a framework for an article that readers could use as an introduction to the concept and as a gateway to a range of more specialised articles. Comments and contributions are invited. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 09:30, 26 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Needs for links for political articles; at least standard terminology == | |||
In current popular American political discourse, the "market" is thrown about as an ideal, but there are serious oversimplifications. While, all too often, the word is simply a talisman and little thought goes into its meaning, my own thought is that a "free market" is ideally a "perfect market", with the counterintuitive idea that it is usually necessary to have some independent oversight to avoid market manipulation, insider information, etc. The current financial markets deviate from classic assumption on value, and the supply and demand of real goods and services is subordinated to short-term value of (at best) common stock and probably at worst, exotic financial instruments. | |||
Should the [[tragedy of the commons]] be here? | |||
[[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 07:54, 29 October 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:54, 29 October 2010
Framework
I have set up a framework for an article that readers could use as an introduction to the concept and as a gateway to a range of more specialised articles. Comments and contributions are invited. Nick Gardner 09:30, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Needs for links for political articles; at least standard terminology
In current popular American political discourse, the "market" is thrown about as an ideal, but there are serious oversimplifications. While, all too often, the word is simply a talisman and little thought goes into its meaning, my own thought is that a "free market" is ideally a "perfect market", with the counterintuitive idea that it is usually necessary to have some independent oversight to avoid market manipulation, insider information, etc. The current financial markets deviate from classic assumption on value, and the supply and demand of real goods and services is subordinated to short-term value of (at best) common stock and probably at worst, exotic financial instruments.
Should the tragedy of the commons be here?
Howard C. Berkowitz 07:54, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
- Article with Definition
- Economics Category Check
- Business Category Check
- Developed Articles
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Economics Developed Articles
- Economics Advanced Articles
- Economics Nonstub Articles
- Economics Internal Articles
- Business Developed Articles
- Business Advanced Articles
- Business Nonstub Articles
- Business Internal Articles