Template talk:GroupInfoTableLine: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Somewhere you've accounted for either too many or too few columns. By enabling that line that is commented out, it goes to the next line, checking for the existence of Lee R Berger's data in column 1 of the next row... it could be that some boolean check is failing to work entirely, and skipping right to the next data set. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 16:18, 25 January 2008 (CST) | :Somewhere you've accounted for either too many or too few columns. By enabling that line that is commented out, it goes to the next line, checking for the existence of Lee R Berger's data in column 1 of the next row... it could be that some boolean check is failing to work entirely, and skipping right to the next data set. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 16:18, 25 January 2008 (CST) | ||
Prove it. That's what I thought. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 16:38, 25 January 2008 (CST) | Prove it. That's what I thought. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 16:38, 25 January 2008 (CST) | ||
Also, a data point to make your head hurt: [[CZ:Anthropology Workgroup/Status]] works just fine (actually, it's fixed) when you un-comment out that line, but [[CZ:Group Status]], which doesn't even ''use'' that line, breaks when you un-comment it out. I'm sure this is a clue... --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 16:43, 25 January 2008 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 16:43, 25 January 2008
I can't figure this out. Why is it when I comment out that line (or any line) suddenly CZ:Group Status works--otherwise, not? Sigh --Larry Sanger 14:55, 25 January 2008 (CST)
- Which line? --Robert W King 14:56, 25 January 2008 (CST)
The one that is now commented out. --Larry Sanger 16:03, 25 January 2008 (CST)
- Somewhere you've accounted for either too many or too few columns. By enabling that line that is commented out, it goes to the next line, checking for the existence of Lee R Berger's data in column 1 of the next row... it could be that some boolean check is failing to work entirely, and skipping right to the next data set. --Robert W King 16:18, 25 January 2008 (CST)
Prove it. That's what I thought. --Larry Sanger 16:38, 25 January 2008 (CST)
Also, a data point to make your head hurt: CZ:Anthropology Workgroup/Status works just fine (actually, it's fixed) when you un-comment out that line, but CZ:Group Status, which doesn't even use that line, breaks when you un-comment it out. I'm sure this is a clue... --Larry Sanger 16:43, 25 January 2008 (CST)