Affine scheme: Difference between revisions
imported>Giovanni Antonio DiMatteo (→The Structural Sheaf: centering) |
imported>Giovanni Antonio DiMatteo |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<math>(E)</math> is the ideal of <math>A</math> generated by <math>E</math>. | <math>(E)</math> is the ideal of <math>A</math> generated by <math>E</math>. | ||
== | ==The functor V and topological properties of Spec(-)== | ||
<math>Spec(A)</math> is quasi-compact and <math>T_0</math>, but is rarely Hausdorff. | <math>Spec(A)</math> is quasi-compact and <math>T_0</math>, but is rarely Hausdorff. |
Revision as of 02:59, 14 December 2007
Definition
For a commutative ring , the set (called the prime spectrum of ) denotes the set of prime ideals of $A$. This set is endowed with a topology of closed sets, where closed subsets are defined to be of the form
for any subset . This topology of closed sets is called the Zariski topology on . It is easy to check that , where is the ideal of generated by .
The functor V and topological properties of Spec(-)
is quasi-compact and , but is rarely Hausdorff.
The Structural Sheaf
has a natural sheaf of rings, denoted , called the structural sheaf of X. The important properties of this sheaf are that
- The stalk is isomorphic to the local ring , where is the prime ideal corresponding to .
- For all , , where is the localization of by the multiplicative set . In particular, .
Explicitly, the structural sheaf may be constructed as follows. To each open set , associate the set of functions
; that is, is locally constant if for every , there is an open neighborhood contained in and elements such that for all , (in particular, is required to not be an element of any ). This description is phrased in a common way of thinking of sheaves, and in fact captures their local nature. One construction of the sheafification functor makes use of such a perspective.
The Category of Affine Schemes
Regarding as a contravariant functor between the category of commutative rings and the category of affine schemes, one can show that it is in fact an anti-equivalence of categories.