Talk:History of astronomy: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Ro Thorpe
No edit summary
imported>Ro Thorpe
Line 5: Line 5:
Shouldn't this page be moved to Astronomy, History of?  That is the format used in other groups, like
Shouldn't this page be moved to Astronomy, History of?  That is the format used in other groups, like
[[Paris, History of]].
[[Paris, History of]].
:I seem to remember something like that, but that one only gives red.  Can you think of another example? (I've tried a few.) [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 16:50, 31 December 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 16:50, 31 December 2007

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Chronology of the development and history of astronomy. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Astronomy and History [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

At this point I am simply listing the major contributors. I will work up sections for specific eras which will include the contributors and will also work on a paradigm theme within the article. The Arabs and the Chinese listing will come in a day or so as I have time. Thomas Simmons 22:31, 24 November 2007 (CST)

move page

Shouldn't this page be moved to Astronomy, History of? That is the format used in other groups, like Paris, History of.

I seem to remember something like that, but that one only gives red. Can you think of another example? (I've tried a few.) Ro Thorpe 16:50, 31 December 2007 (CST)