Talk:Reiki: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Tom Morris
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
Line 4: Line 4:


Perhaps it's the [[materialism|materialist]]/[[positivism|positivist]] inside me speaking, but I feel slightly uncomfortable having this in the Philosophy Workgroup. Anyone got any strong opinions on it being here or not? I'd probably go with removing philosophy from the list of article categories. --[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] 12:46, 28 June 2008 (CDT)
Perhaps it's the [[materialism|materialist]]/[[positivism|positivist]] inside me speaking, but I feel slightly uncomfortable having this in the Philosophy Workgroup. Anyone got any strong opinions on it being here or not? I'd probably go with removing philosophy from the list of article categories. --[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] 12:46, 28 June 2008 (CDT)
== Skepticism and FIXME"? ==
I'm not sure what the FIXMEs are supposed to be.
"The ritual of a reiki healing, as well as the sympathetic ear of the reiki practitioner, are the cause of the benefit rather than the reiki energy.<nowiki><ref>Skeptic's Dictionary, [http://www.skepdic.com/reiki.html reiki]</ref></nowiki>" Sorry, the Skeptic's Dictionary is not authoritative about the mechanism, or lack of mechanism, of reiki. It should be reasonably practical to do sham ritual and do randomized controlled trials.
No, this should not be Philosophy, but Health Sciences.
[[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 04:03, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:03, 24 June 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  Japanese spiritual healing process and philosophical system that claims to be able to manipulate energy fields. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category:  No categories listed [Editors asked to check categories]
 Subgroup categories:  Pseudoscience and Complementary and alternative medicine
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English
  • At least one workgroup needs to be assigned.
Metadata here


Wonder how fellow Philosophy Workgroup authors feel about this being in our purview?

Perhaps it's the materialist/positivist inside me speaking, but I feel slightly uncomfortable having this in the Philosophy Workgroup. Anyone got any strong opinions on it being here or not? I'd probably go with removing philosophy from the list of article categories. --Tom Morris 12:46, 28 June 2008 (CDT)

Skepticism and FIXME"?

I'm not sure what the FIXMEs are supposed to be.

"The ritual of a reiki healing, as well as the sympathetic ear of the reiki practitioner, are the cause of the benefit rather than the reiki energy.<ref>Skeptic's Dictionary, [http://www.skepdic.com/reiki.html reiki]</ref>" Sorry, the Skeptic's Dictionary is not authoritative about the mechanism, or lack of mechanism, of reiki. It should be reasonably practical to do sham ritual and do randomized controlled trials.

No, this should not be Philosophy, but Health Sciences.

Howard C. Berkowitz 04:03, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Reiki&oldid=345853"