Talk:Vedas: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Joe Quick
m (New page: {{subpages}})
 
imported>Brian P. Long
(→‎One more move?: new section)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
== One more move? ==
I came to this article by way of the deleted Veda article, and my question is why the article (which does a good job of covering the shruti/smrti thing) is called 'Vedas'. My suggestion would be that we should have an article on 'the [[sacred texts of Hinduism]]', which could then encompass the RV, the other vedas, the upanisads, the epics, and so forth. We could also have individual articles on each work and perhaps each category of work ([[Sanskrit epics]], e.g.).
I guess what I'm saying in a roundabout way is that there does not seem to me to be a whole lot of justification for considering the "Vedas" as an object of study and an encyclopedia article, in particular considering the heterogeneity of the RV and the later vedas. If I don't hear anything in the next couple of days--especially considering the stub-like nature of the Vedas page, I'm going to move this article to [[sacred texts of Hinduism]] and start other articles on each of the individual vedas. [[User:Brian P. Long|Brian P. Long]] 12:03, 9 February 2008 (CST)

Revision as of 13:03, 9 February 2008

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Oldest layer of Sanskrit literature and the oldest sacred texts of Hinduism. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Religion [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

One more move?

I came to this article by way of the deleted Veda article, and my question is why the article (which does a good job of covering the shruti/smrti thing) is called 'Vedas'. My suggestion would be that we should have an article on 'the sacred texts of Hinduism', which could then encompass the RV, the other vedas, the upanisads, the epics, and so forth. We could also have individual articles on each work and perhaps each category of work (Sanskrit epics, e.g.).

I guess what I'm saying in a roundabout way is that there does not seem to me to be a whole lot of justification for considering the "Vedas" as an object of study and an encyclopedia article, in particular considering the heterogeneity of the RV and the later vedas. If I don't hear anything in the next couple of days--especially considering the stub-like nature of the Vedas page, I'm going to move this article to sacred texts of Hinduism and start other articles on each of the individual vedas. Brian P. Long 12:03, 9 February 2008 (CST)