Talk:PH: Difference between revisions
imported>Peter Schmitt (→typographical remark: new section) |
imported>Peter Schmitt (→missing definition/explanation: new section) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Numbers do not need a "\mathrm". But O and H are symbols, not variables, and therefore should be \rm. [[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 10:03, 4 June 2009 (UTC) | Numbers do not need a "\mathrm". But O and H are symbols, not variables, and therefore should be \rm. [[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 10:03, 4 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
== missing definition/explanation == | |||
What does "[..]" stand for? [[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 10:05, 4 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:05, 4 June 2009
Article name
Is there anyway to get the initial p to be minuscule rather than capitalized (or should we just rename the article to Potential of hydrogen)? Wikipedia seems to use a {{lowercase}} template that we don't have. Benjamin Seghers 14:09, 9 October 2007 (CDT)
- I've created a {{lowercase}} by simply copying the code from Wikipedia's same template. Not sure if it's allowed, but it worked. Benjamin Seghers 14:27, 9 October 2007 (CDT)
the formula
The pH formula is wrong in reality, pH should be related to the activity (effective concentration) of hydrogen ions, but not just the concentration of hydrogen ions. However, I do not know how to modify the formula, can anyone correct this?
the formula
The pH formula is wrong in reality, pH should be related to the activity (effective concentration) of hydrogen ions, but not just the concentration of hydrogen ions. However, I do not know how to modify the formula, can anyone correct this?--Wong Hung Kong Dylan 05:42, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- You are right, the pH formula is too simple-minded. It has the form that I (and probably many others) learned in high-school. As high-schools probably still teach it in this form, the formula has some (educational) use. --Paul Wormer 11:59, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
typographical remark
Numbers do not need a "\mathrm". But O and H are symbols, not variables, and therefore should be \rm. Peter Schmitt 10:03, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
missing definition/explanation
What does "[..]" stand for? Peter Schmitt 10:05, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Article with Definition
- Developed Articles
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Chemistry Developed Articles
- Chemistry Advanced Articles
- Chemistry Nonstub Articles
- Chemistry Internal Articles
- Engineering Developed Articles
- Engineering Advanced Articles
- Engineering Nonstub Articles
- Engineering Internal Articles
- Chemical Engineering tag