Chemistry/Approval: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Chris Day
No edit summary
 
imported>Chris Day
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
 
{{subpages}}
==Approval Area==
==Approval Area==
{{Approval|ToA editor=Robert Tito|cat1=Chemistry|article url=http://pilot.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Chemistry&oldid=100051770|date=03/12/2007}}
{{Approval|ToA editor=Robert Tito|cat1=Chemistry|article url=http://pilot.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Chemistry&oldid=100051770|date=03/12/2007}}
-->
 
Approval on [http://pilot.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Chemistry&oldid=100052194 this  article log item]  actioned by Constable [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 23:37, 11 March 2007 (CDT)
Approval on [http://pilot.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Chemistry&oldid=100052194 this  article log item]  actioned by Constable [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 23:37, 11 March 2007 (CDT)



Revision as of 15:54, 26 September 2007

This article has a Citable Version.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Catalogs [?]
 
Return to the current talk page for the article Chemistry
This article has a Citable Version.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Catalogs [?]
 
Return to the current talk page for the article Chemistry

Approval Area

Robert Tito nominated this version of this article for approval. The Chemistry Workgroup oversaw this approval and the article was approved on, or around, 03/12/2007.

Approval on this article log item actioned by Constable David Tribe 23:37, 11 March 2007 (CDT)

APPROVED Version 1

Discussion Area Records leading to approved Version 1 are below

I changed some words again to what I think is clearer: affinity is 18th century, oxygen is Capital O , not zero, and apparently the familiar html markup works. But I only got to the first paragraph, and i still think it sounds clunky. DavidGoodman 21:42, 2 November 2006 (CST)

yes, still needs lots more work, but it's getting better.Nancy Sculerati MD 23:12, 2 November 2006 (CST)