Talk:Michael Polanyi: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Moved it. Chris, welcome again and thanks for the article! --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 19:04, 21 September 2007 (CDT) | Moved it. Chris, welcome again and thanks for the article! --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 19:04, 21 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
Chris, if this article came from Wikipedia, and anyone else contributed to this version of it, then we have to credit WP by checking the "Content is from Wikipedia?" box. (I've done so.) On the other hand, if you are solely responsible for the text here, then you can say so at the top of this talk page (see [[CZ:WP2CZ|this help page]]), and uncheck the box. Note that, when checking or unchecking the box, you have to make some other little edit to get the edit (just adding a space at the end of any paragraph will do it) to "take." --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 19:11, 21 September 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:11, 21 September 2007
Is there any reason that this article is called Polanyi instead of Michael Polanyi, as per the normal CZ naming conventions? Ie, he is generally known by his last name only, the way some movie people such as Capucine are primarily known by a single name? If not, the article should be "Move"d to a new article called Michael Polanyi. Hayford Peirce 14:09, 21 September 2007 (CDT)
Moved it. Chris, welcome again and thanks for the article! --Larry Sanger 19:04, 21 September 2007 (CDT)
Chris, if this article came from Wikipedia, and anyone else contributed to this version of it, then we have to credit WP by checking the "Content is from Wikipedia?" box. (I've done so.) On the other hand, if you are solely responsible for the text here, then you can say so at the top of this talk page (see this help page), and uncheck the box. Note that, when checking or unchecking the box, you have to make some other little edit to get the edit (just adding a space at the end of any paragraph will do it) to "take." --Larry Sanger 19:11, 21 September 2007 (CDT)