CZ Talk:Essentials: Difference between revisions
imported>Daniel Mietchen (→Still needs to be rewritten: new section) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (→Controversies: new section) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Some inspiration on how to do it is [http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/10/worthy_books.html here]. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 16:00, 22 October 2009 (UTC) | Some inspiration on how to do it is [http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/10/worthy_books.html here]. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 16:00, 22 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Controversies == | |||
Joe, I find your rewrite a little too soft: "We identify mainstream and non-mainstream views as such and if necessary, we "take a step back" and ''describe'' any controversies fairly, rather than trying to settle them in any way at all. " Settle? Perhaps not. Identify position(s) held by expert(s), versus, for example, popular culture and conspiracy theorists, yes. Sorry, the Men in Black are requiring me to stop writing. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 16:25, 22 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:25, 22 October 2009
This needs to be rewritten. The essentials have changed!!! --Larry Sanger 12:13, 10 September 2007 (CDT)
Perhaps we should move this page to CZ:Essentials instead of limiting ourselves to twelve. I'll gladly move it, etc, if that idea has some support. --Todd Coles 21:21, 15 February 2008 (CST)
Still needs to be rewritten
Some inspiration on how to do it is here. --Daniel Mietchen 16:00, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Controversies
Joe, I find your rewrite a little too soft: "We identify mainstream and non-mainstream views as such and if necessary, we "take a step back" and describe any controversies fairly, rather than trying to settle them in any way at all. " Settle? Perhaps not. Identify position(s) held by expert(s), versus, for example, popular culture and conspiracy theorists, yes. Sorry, the Men in Black are requiring me to stop writing. Howard C. Berkowitz 16:25, 22 October 2009 (UTC)