Talk:Phishing: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Ched Davis
(→‎Link to add?: new section)
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
Line 4: Line 4:


would [http://www.mywot.com/ Web of Trust] be a link to add, or would it be considered spam? I don't want to forum, but I use both it and site advisor and have found them to be helpful in steering away from potentially harmful sites.  Thanks [[User:Ched Davis|Ched Davis]] 23:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
would [http://www.mywot.com/ Web of Trust] be a link to add, or would it be considered spam? I don't want to forum, but I use both it and site advisor and have found them to be helpful in steering away from potentially harmful sites.  Thanks [[User:Ched Davis|Ched Davis]] 23:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
:Terminology issue here: I need to go look at that link, but my first association with Web of Trust is with the [[Pretty Good Privacy]].  It's reasonable to put informative links into an External Links subpage; this gets created as a blank tab when you create the basic metadata. You can try doing that here if you feel comfortable, or I can set it up.
:Links can be commercial if not advertising; some of the security vendors have very informative pages. Of course, one always has to be sure links stay active. It is a good idea to discuss, in the main article, the idea of blacklisting and whitelisting, which probably also need their own, more general articles.
:We do need [[social engineering]] and some related areas that make phishing possible; indeed, see [[deception]] for a broader context on that, to which social engineering might link.[[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 23:42, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:42, 7 February 2009

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Use of online social engineering methods in order to persuade a victim to part with personal details such as online banking logins, in order to perpetrate fraud. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Computers and Law [Categories OK]
 Subgroup category:  Security
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Link to add?

would Web of Trust be a link to add, or would it be considered spam? I don't want to forum, but I use both it and site advisor and have found them to be helpful in steering away from potentially harmful sites. Thanks Ched Davis 23:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Terminology issue here: I need to go look at that link, but my first association with Web of Trust is with the Pretty Good Privacy. It's reasonable to put informative links into an External Links subpage; this gets created as a blank tab when you create the basic metadata. You can try doing that here if you feel comfortable, or I can set it up.
Links can be commercial if not advertising; some of the security vendors have very informative pages. Of course, one always has to be sure links stay active. It is a good idea to discuss, in the main article, the idea of blacklisting and whitelisting, which probably also need their own, more general articles.
We do need social engineering and some related areas that make phishing possible; indeed, see deception for a broader context on that, to which social engineering might link.Howard C. Berkowitz 23:42, 7 February 2009 (UTC)