Talk:Van der Waals equation/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>David E. Volk
(Suggest Approval, point out possible typo)
imported>Chris Day
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = Van der Waals equation of state
|                cat1 = chemistry
|                cat2 = physics
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check =
|              status = 1
|        underlinked = yes
|            cleanup =
|                  by = --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 03:12, 9 September 2007 (CDT)
}}


WP article is for 90% mine.--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 04:24, 22 August 2007 (CDT)
WP article is for 90% mine.--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 04:24, 22 August 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 14:52, 4 October 2007

This article has a Citable Version.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition An equation of state for a fluid composed of particles that have a non-zero size and a pairwise attractive inter-particle force. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Chemistry and Physics [Categories OK]
 Subgroup category:  Chemical Engineering
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

WP article is for 90% mine.--Paul Wormer 04:24, 22 August 2007 (CDT)

I changed a lot in the CZ version w.r.t the WP version (added a graph and removed a redundant equation), but forgot to switch off the WP flag. I dare now to give it status 1. --Paul Wormer 03:12, 9 September 2007 (CDT)


[[Category:{{{group}}} to Approve]]

Toapprove.png
[[User:{{{editor}}}|{{{editor}}}]] has nominated [{{{url}}} this version] of this article for approval. Other editors may also sign to support approval. The [[CZ:{{{group}}} Workgroup|{{{group}}} Workgroup]] is overseeing this approval. Unless this notice is removed, the article will be approved on {{{date}}}.

However, there does appear to be an "n" missing in p V = RT in the text just below the isotherm figure David E. Volk 14:47, 4 October 2007 (CDT)