Talk:Van der Waals equation/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis
No edit summary
imported>Olier Raby
(Corrections.)
Line 18: Line 18:
==APPROVED Version 1.0==  
==APPROVED Version 1.0==  
<div class="usermessage plainlinks">Discussion for [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Van_der_Waals_equation&direction=next&oldid=100181276 Version 1.0] stopped here. Please continue further discussion under this break. </div>
<div class="usermessage plainlinks">Discussion for [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Van_der_Waals_equation&direction=next&oldid=100181276 Version 1.0] stopped here. Please continue further discussion under this break. </div>
== Corrections ==
This article has no category.
At the beginning, we see some MediaWiki code. Please remove it.
[[User:Olier Raby|Olier Raby]] 05:22, 27 October 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 04:22, 27 October 2007

This article has a Citable Version.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition An equation of state for a fluid composed of particles that have a non-zero size and a pairwise attractive inter-particle force. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Chemistry and Physics [Categories OK]
 Subgroup category:  Chemical Engineering
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

WP article is for 90% mine.--Paul Wormer 04:24, 22 August 2007 (CDT)

I changed a lot in the CZ version w.r.t the WP version (added a graph and removed a redundant equation), but forgot to switch off the WP flag. I dare now to give it status 1. --Paul Wormer 03:12, 9 September 2007 (CDT)

{{ToApprove}} However, there does appear to be an "n" missing in p V = RT in the text just below the isotherm figure David E. Volk 14:47, 4 October 2007 (CDT)

I have reinserted the n but it states: approximates meaning that a constant can be omitted as it behaves according to pv=RT. R being a constant derived during the equation derivation can for that evident reason not be omitted. Robert Tito |  Talk 

References

Leiden, 1873 is not informative, is there is full reference for it? Kim van der Linde 16:27, 4 October 2007 (CDT)

I will see if I can dig op the article in the Kammerlingh Onnes lab. It will however be of little importance since it is most likely written in Dutch, there will be however references in the (copy) of the original including translations. Robert Tito |  Talk  16:32, 4 October 2007 (CDT)

APPROVED Version 1.0

Corrections

This article has no category.

At the beginning, we see some MediaWiki code. Please remove it.

Olier Raby 05:22, 27 October 2007 (CDT)