Archive:New Draft of the Week: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen
(→‎Add New Nominees Here: corecting vote count)
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
Line 23: Line 23:
|-
|-
| <!-- article              --> [[Steam]]
| <!-- article              --> [[Steam]]
| <!-- score                --> 3
| <!-- score                --> 5
| <!-- supporters            --> [[User:Meg Ireland|Meg Ireland]]
| <!-- supporters            --> [[User:Meg Ireland|Meg Ireland]]
| <!-- specialist supporters --> [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] ''';<br/>'''
| <!-- specialist supporters --> [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] '''; [[User: Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]]<br/>'''
| <!-- date created          --> 13 November 2009
| <!-- date created          --> 13 November 2009
|-
|-
| <!-- article              --> [[Tall tale]]
| <!-- article              --> [[Tall tale]]
| <!-- score                --> 1
| <!-- score                --> 2
| <!-- supporters            --> [[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]]<br/>'''
| <!-- supporters            --> [[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]]<br/>; [[User: Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]]<br/>''''''
| <!-- specialist supporters -->  
| <!-- specialist supporters -->  
| <!-- date created          --> 9 March 2010
| <!-- date created          --> 9 March 2010

Revision as of 18:26, 9 March 2010

The New Draft of the Week is a chance to highlight a recently created Citizendium article that has just started down the road of becoming a Citizendium masterpiece.
It is chosen each week by vote in a manner similar to that of its sister project, the Article of the Week.

Add New Nominees Here

To add a new nominee or vote for an existing nominee, click edit for this section and follow the instructions


Table of Nominees
Nominated article Vote
Score		 Supporters Specialist supporters Date created
Steam 5 Meg Ireland Milton Beychok ; Howard C. Berkowitz
 		13 November 2009
Tall tale 2 Daniel Mietchen
; Howard C. Berkowitz
' 		9 March 2010

If you want to see how these nominees will look on the CZ home page (if selected as a winner), scroll down a little bit.

Recently created pages are listed on Special:NewPages. A cleaner list is available here.

Transclusion of the above nominees (to be done by an Administrator)

View Current Transcluded Nominees (after they have been transcluded by an Administrator)

The next New Draft of the Week will be the article with the most votes at 1 AM UTC on Thursday, 1 April, 2010.


Nominated article Supporters Specialist supporters Dates Score
Level3.jpg [[]]: Add brief definition or description
{{:}} ([[|Read more...]])

Current Winner (to be selected and implemented by an Administrator)

To change, click edit and follow the instructions, or see documentation at {{Featured Article}}.

Higher mathematics in pre-modern Japan, also known as wasan (和算), flourished during the Edo period from the early 17th to the late 19th centuries. It had its origins in the Chinese mathematical texts which were acquired by the Japanese during their invasions of Korea in the late 16th century.[1] In a fairly isolated state, the Japanese mathematicians were able to make brilliant new discoveries in areas rarely attributed to a non-Western scholarship, sometimes outpacing their Western counterparts.[2]

Studies of Japanese mathematics were prompted by the introduction of Western mathematics to Japan and the subsequent decline of wasan during the latter half of the 19th century. Despite the steady increase in the number of articles published in Japanese since the 1920s, the subject remained at the backstage because of postwar-Japan’s scientific national policy. This changed in the recent years with the revisionist historians who have sought to contradict the Eurocentric historical views by reevaluating the non-Western sciences.[3] In this revisionist discourse, the centerpiece has often consisted of China and Japan, both of which defied the West’s totalitarian portrait of the Orient[4] by building vibrant economies and achieving comparable scientific advances before the mid-1800s.[5]

Mathematics during the Asuka and Nara periods

PD Diagram
Japan's first water clock was built during the Asuka period by Emperor Tenchi.

The oldest known case of mathematics in Japan was a system of exponential notation for high powers of ten, similar to the exponential law , which was in use before Jimmu’s legendary founding of Japan in the seventh century BCE. Findings on the subsequent cases of mathematics in ancient Japan come from the 6th century CE and afterwards when Buddhism was introduced from Korea. During the reign of Empress Suiko, the Chinese chronological system was made known, books on astrology and the calendar were introduced, and the first almanacs came into use. Prince Shotoku was so engaged in these learnings that he was honored as the father of Japanese mathematics. Emperor Tenchi, who ruled from 668 to 671 CE, created a water clock and defined the length of a day as one hundred hours. Around this time, a school of arithmetic and an observatory were also established. In 701, Emperor Monbu established a university system that included mathematical studies based on nine Chinese texts.[6] The most important among them concerned algebra, which enabled the creation of the department of “Arithmetic Intelligence” responsible for land survey and tax collection in 718. Calculations of the period were done with small bamboo sticks known as sangi, which were arranged differently like the Roman numerals to represent different numbers and were placed on paper with prescribed operations.[7]

After this brief period of enthusiasm and progress, Japanese mathematics unfortunately stagnated and stalled for nine hundred years. The nine Chinese texts were eventually forgotten, and mathematics in Japan degenerated into a superstitious body of knowledge that concerned puzzles and fortune telling. It was said that the knowledge of division was lost except in some religious establishments where calendar manuscripts were found.[8] During the Kamakura and the Muromachi periods, occasional references to sangi indicate that its use continued, but no new developments materialized.[9]

Wasan during the Edo period

(PD) Text: Yoshida Mitsuyoshi
Yoshida's Jinkoki discusses the soroban.

The Dark Age for Japanese mathematics ended with Toyotomi Hideyoshi’s invasion of Korea in 1592. A soldier was able to return to the port of Hakata with a Chinese abacus, which existed in China since the 1200s and became known as soroban in Japanese.[10] Its use became widespread after Mori Shigeyoshi published an introductory text regarding the abacus in 1622, although it did not completely replace the sangi that was more convenient for complex algebraic operations.[11] A more extensive text, and also the first complete mathematics book in Japan, was published under the title, Jinkoki, or Large and Small Numbers, in 1627 by Yoshida Mitsuyoshi. It was based on a famous Chinese text that was published in 1593 and dealt mostly with methods of computations such as multiplication, division, and the extraction of square and cube roots on the abacus.[12] Yoshida published at least six new editions of the Jinkoki, and among them the 1641 edition was the beginning of idai,[1] in which open problems are presented to the readers at the end of the book.[13]

Fair Use Photo
Geometry was the most frequent type of problems that appeared on the sangaku tablets.

After this initial takeoff, Japanese mathematics steadily progressed, primarily in areas of geometry and number theory,[14] within an open intellectual dialogue that was initially facilitated and proliferated by the samurai class. At the onset, mathematics was mostly pursued by the samurais as it had military application in surveying, navigation, and calendar making.[15] As the samurais came to work as civil servants with modest stipends, they also taught reading, writing, and arithmetic in small private schools called juku, which comprised much of the educational system in pre-modern Japan. Because of the low attendance fees, juku’s were widely attended by members across all ages and economic strata, and consequently mathematics became widely accessible within the Japanese society. People who could not afford to publish their own books posted their new findings on wooden prayer tablets in temples as offering to the gods. These tablets, which became known as sangaku, allowed the Japanese mathematicians to exchange ideas and identify new problems and thus transformed the temples into intellectual forums facilitating a nationwide dialogue. This open and collaborative discourse also existed in publications through the practice of idai, and it accelerated advances in Japanese mathematics, which took tangible form as wasan by the end of the seventeenth century.[16]

How wasan was expressed

Example of mathematical notations in wasan:

(Fair Use) Diagram: Tsukane Ogawa

The number of vertical lines represent the coefficient; for example, "||" means "".

長 is designated as ; 短, ; and 中, .

巾 means , and 勾 means "/".

How was wasan expressed and solved? It was written vertically in Kanbun, or classical Chinese, that served a similar role in East Asia as Latin in medieval Europe as the written language of higher culture.[17] Because there were only few symbols involved, more complicated equations had to be accompanied by sentences.[18] The traditional Japanese mathematicians did not discriminate between the rational and the irrational numbers, since they did not convert into decimals. This meant that, unlike their Western contemporaries,[19] the Japanese did not automatically assume π to consist of repeating decimals. It is also important to note that there was no concept of the Cartesian plane in wasan, which limited the understanding differential calculus for the Japanese.[20]

Types of problems

In the beginning, wasan included problems dealing with practical concerns, such as the calendar, which stimulated some of the most important findings in the studies of curves.[21] Yoshida introduced the challenge of calculating the value of pi as an idai problem in a later edition of his Jinkoki’s. The first to solve the problem was Muramatsu Shigekiyo, who wrote in 1663 that π = 3.14195264877.[22] He used the same technique that was used by Archimedes nineteen hundred years earlier, in which the value of pi is approximated on a regular polygon with a very large number of sides (in Muramatsu’s case, 32,768). Seki Takakazu, Japan’s most celebrated mathematician, calculated a much more accurate value of pi to be 355/113, which was correct to the eleventh digit.[23] He first used Muramatsu’s method to calculate the perimeters of three polygons with 215, 216, and 217 sides respectively. Then he posited that the perimeter of an infinite-sided polygon, a.k.a. the circle, is the sum of a geometric series ( a + ar + ar2 + ar3…), which equals to a/(1 - r) with infinite number of terms:

P(∞) = P(15) + a/(1-r) = P(16) + a1 a2 /( a1 - a2 ) = P(16) +[ P(16) - P(15) ][ P(17) - P(16) ] /{[ P(16) - P(15) ] - [ P(17) - P(16) ]}

(PD) Diagram: Seki Takakazu
Seki's square matrices from his 1633 manuscript Kaifuku Dai.

He let a1 equal the difference in the perimeters of 215 and 216-sided polygons, a2 equal the difference in the perimeters of 216 and 217-sided polygons, and r equal the ratio of the differences, a2 and a1.

Seki evidently took great interest in the number theory, as his other achievements include discovering the theory of determinants, the Bernoulli numbers, and Horner’s method for extracting irrational roots before the European mathematicians who are given credit for originating them.[24] He also devoted one of his seven books to the magic squares.

(CC) Image: Chunbum Park
Construction of Seki's magic square.

In one example, Seki drew a filled 3 by 3 square and a blank 7 by 7 (which is 2n + 1, in which n = 3) square. Then he started numbering to the right from the cell to the left of the upper right-hand corner until he reached n (in this case, number 3). Then he numbered left from the cell left of 1 until he reached the 2n-1 (in this case, number 5). Then he numbered down the right side to the cell preceding the lower right-hand one. Then he numbered along the top row until he reached the upper left-hand corner. Then he filled the left-hand column and the bottom row by subtracting from (2n + 1)2 + 1 the respective numbers on the opposite side. Then he switched n (in this case, 3) figures to the left of the upper right-hand corner with the corresponding ones in the lower row, and likewise for the n figures above the lower right hand corner, resulting in a square shown in fig. 11. Finally he filled the inner cells by repeating the procedure with number 13, resulting in the square shown in fig. 12, which includes all numbers from 1 to 49, which paired at opposite ends equal to 50 (11 + 39 = 50 ; 34 + 16 = 50 ; 12 + 38 = 50), and features consecutive patterns at intervals of 3 (10, 11, 12; 23, 25, 27; 43, 42, 41; 8, 18, 28; 24, 34, 44..).[25]

Outside the published works, Japanese mathematics was usually limited to geometry problems that were found on the sangaku tablets. Geometry problems sometimes concerned beautiful arrangement of shapes, such as a fan, and solving them were considered as a type of art in itself.[21] Some geometric problems related to more practical concerns of architecture and woodcraft. One such case involved the lotus decorations of the Japanese temples from the Asuka and the Nara periods (538-794). As the lotus fruits were usually arranged in densest packaging within the receptacle, a practical artistic concern was the densest packing of circles within circles. The Japanese may also have had an interest in the densest packing problems because they addressed the practical issues of economical cutting and arrangement of objects.[26] Geometry problems continued to evolve in more complex forms, until they eventually involved intersecting solids and surface areas.[27]

Wasan's decline and conclusion

Despite its substantial achievements, mathematics in Japan never led to a discovery of mechanical or physical laws as it has in the West. This was partly because mathematics was considered as more of a recreational art rather than science. The Japanese mathematicians also refused to denigrate their works as those of the artisans by solving problems relating to practical issues. Instead they focused on abstract problems, which made inevitable the displacement of wasan by western mathematics by the late Tokugawa period.[28]

notes

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Okumura, 2009. pp. 79
  2. ↑ Ruttkay, 2008. pp. 1
  3. ↑ Ogawa, 2001.pp. 146-147
  4. ↑ Hobson, 2004. pp. 226
  5. ↑ Hanley, 1999. pp. 13
  6. ↑ Smith and Mikami, 1914. pp. 4-9
  7. ↑ Hideotshi and Rothman, 2008. pp. 10-12
  8. ↑ Smith and Mikami, 1914. pp. 14-15
  9. ↑ Hideotshi and Rothman, 2008. pp. 14
  10. ↑ Palmer
  11. ↑ Hideotshi and Rothman, 2008. pp. 19
  12. ↑ Smith and Mikami, 1914. pp. 38
  13. ↑ Hideotshi and Rothman, 2008. pp. 13-16
  14. ↑ Okumura, 2009. pp. 80
  15. ↑ Bartholomew, 1989. pp. 21
  16. ↑ Hideotshi and Rothman, 2008. pp. 19-21
  17. ↑ Hideotshi and Rothman, 2008. pp. 9
  18. ↑ Ogawa, 2001.pp. 140
  19. ↑ Hideotshi and Rothman, 2008. pp. 75
  20. ↑ Morimoto, 2009. pp. 132-133
  21. ↑ 21.0 21.1 Ogawa, 2001.pp. 145
  22. ↑ "Japanese mathematics in the Edo period (1600-1868) (Science networks. Historical studies)." Lavoisier Librairie. Web. 07 Dec. 2009. <http://www.lavoisier.fr>.
  23. ↑ Hideotshi and Rothman, 2008. pp. 16
  24. ↑ Hideotshi and Rothman, 2008. pp. 69-71
  25. ↑ Smith and Mikami, 1914. pp. 116-118
  26. ↑ Tarnai and Miyazaki, 2003. pp. 145-149
  27. ↑ Okumura, 2009. pp. 81
  28. ↑ Ravina, 1993. pp. 205-207

(Read more...)

Previous Winners

Rules and Procedure

Rules

  • The primary criterion of eligibility for a new draft is that it must have been ranked as a status 1 or 2 (developed or developing), as documented in the History of the article's Metadate template, no more than one month before the date of the next selection (currently every Thursday).
  • Any Citizen may nominate a draft.
  • No Citizen may have nominated more than one article listed under "current nominees" at a time.
  • The article's nominator is indicated simply by the first name in the list of votes (see below).
  • At least for now--while the project is still small--you may nominate and vote for drafts of which you are a main author.
  • An article can be the New Draft of the Week only once. Nominated articles that have won this honor should be removed from the list and added to the list of previous winners.
  • Comments on nominations should be made on the article's talk page.
  • Any draft will be deleted when it is past its "last date eligible". Don't worry if this happens to your article; consider nominating it as the Article of the Week.
  • If an editor believes that a nominee in his or her area of expertise is ineligible (perhaps due to obvious and embarrassing problems) he or she may remove the draft from consideration. The editor must indicate the reasons why he has done so on the nominated article's talk page.

Nomination

See above section "Add New Nominees Here".

Voting

  • To vote, add your name and date in the Supporters column next to an article title, after other supporters for that article, by signing <br />~~~~. (The date is necessary so that we can determine when the last vote was added.) Your vote is alloted a score of 1.
  • Add your name in the Specialist supporters column only if you are an editor who is an expert about the topic in question. Your vote is alloted a score of 1 for articles that you created and 2 for articles that you did not create.
  • You may vote for as many articles as you wish, and each vote counts separately, but you can only nominate one at a time; see above. You could, theoretically, vote for every nominated article on the page, but this would be pointless.

Ranking

  • The list of articles is sorted by number of votes first, then alphabetically.
  • Admins should make sure that the votes are correctly tallied, but anyone may do this. Note that "Specialist Votes" are worth 3 points.

Updating

  • Each Thursday, one of the admins listed below should move the winning article to the Current Winner section of this page, announce the winner on Citizendium-L and update the "previous winning drafts" section accordingly.
  • The winning article will be the article at the top of the list (ie the one with the most votes).
  • In the event of two or more having the same number of votes :
    • The article with the most specialist supporters is used. Should this fail to produce a winner, the article appearing first by English alphabetical order is used.
    • The remaining winning articles are guaranteed this position in the following weeks, again in alphabetical order. No further voting should take place on these, which remain at the top of the table with notices to that effect. Further nominations and voting take place to determine future winning articles for the following weeks.
    • Winning articles may be named New Draft of the Week beyond their last eligible date if their circumstances are so described above.

Administrators

The Administrators of this program are the same as the admins for CZ:Article of the Week.

References

See Also


Citizendium Initiatives
Eduzendium | Featured Article | Recruitment | Subpages | Core Articles | Uncategorized pages |
Requested Articles | Feedback Requests | Wanted Articles

|width=10% align=center style="background:#F5F5F5"|  |}

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Archive:New_Draft_of_the_Week&oldid=273687"