Talk:Extinction: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nereo Preto
(in my watchlist)
imported>Thomas Simmons
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:


:Thanks [[User:Jasper Wubs|Jasper Wubs]], I took a quick look at the article and will "soon" work on it. A good start could be to clean parts which are not essential, as the example of the ''Edmontosaurus'', in order to add them back later, when the stories will be checked on scientific literature. But see what [[User:Thomas Simmons|Thomas Simmons]] says - he did most of the job here. Cheers, --[[User:Nereo Preto|Nereo Preto]] 10:25, 2 September 2007 (CDT)
:Thanks [[User:Jasper Wubs|Jasper Wubs]], I took a quick look at the article and will "soon" work on it. A good start could be to clean parts which are not essential, as the example of the ''Edmontosaurus'', in order to add them back later, when the stories will be checked on scientific literature. But see what [[User:Thomas Simmons|Thomas Simmons]] says - he did most of the job here. Cheers, --[[User:Nereo Preto|Nereo Preto]] 10:25, 2 September 2007 (CDT)
Not sure I understand the bit about 'not essential'.  Given that we have a reader friendly approach for CZ, to which the article is written adhere, I think the use of such an example for the concept presented is essential and I think the Edmontosaurus-diet hypothesis does a good job of a specific example. We do have evidence that the Edomontosaurus did coexist with angiosperms and possibly consumed them [http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01333.x  (see Form, function and environments of the early angiosperms: merging extant phylogeny and ecophysiology with fossils. page 20)] --[[User:Thomas Simmons|Thomas Simmons]] 20:46, 2 September 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 19:46, 2 September 2007


Article Checklist for "Extinction"
Workgroup category or categories Earth Sciences Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Aleksander Stos 13:05, 6 August 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Hi folks, there appaers to be some concern about this article on the english wikipedia. Apparently there are some issues concerning the lack of italics in the nomenclature of the various genera, furthermore there appears to be misspelling of certain geological periods. And finally they seem to disagree with the story about Edmontosaurus. I say we turn the generic names italic and maybe somebody from the Earth Sciences workgroup can check the geological periods? Whether or not the Edmontosaurus story is correct I've got no idea, maybe someone can check this out too. I havent got too much time today, but I will look in to it when I do. Here's the link to the wikipedia discussion, you can find it in the subsection called Citizendium dinosaur articles. Thought I let you all know, cheers Jasper Wubs 06:59, 30 August 2007 (CDT)

Thanks Jasper Wubs, I took a quick look at the article and will "soon" work on it. A good start could be to clean parts which are not essential, as the example of the Edmontosaurus, in order to add them back later, when the stories will be checked on scientific literature. But see what Thomas Simmons says - he did most of the job here. Cheers, --Nereo Preto 10:25, 2 September 2007 (CDT)

Not sure I understand the bit about 'not essential'. Given that we have a reader friendly approach for CZ, to which the article is written adhere, I think the use of such an example for the concept presented is essential and I think the Edmontosaurus-diet hypothesis does a good job of a specific example. We do have evidence that the Edomontosaurus did coexist with angiosperms and possibly consumed them (see Form, function and environments of the early angiosperms: merging extant phylogeny and ecophysiology with fossils. page 20) --Thomas Simmons 20:46, 2 September 2007 (CDT)