Euclid's lemma: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Michael Underwood
No edit summary
imported>Michael Hardy
Line 6: Line 6:
Let ''a'', ''b'', ''p'' <math>\in\mathbb{Z}</math> with ''p'' prime, and
Let ''a'', ''b'', ''p'' <math>\in\mathbb{Z}</math> with ''p'' prime, and
suppose that ''p'' is a divisor of ''ab'', ''p''|''ab''.
suppose that ''p'' is a divisor of ''ab'', ''p''|''ab''.
Then there exists an [[integer]] ''n'' such that
Then there exists an [[integer]] ''n'' such that ''ab = pn''.  But this means that the fraction
''ab=pn''.  But this means that the fraction
 
:<math>\frac{ab}{p}=n</math>
:<math>\frac{ab}{p}=n</math>
must be an integer as well.
 
Now, since ''p'' is prime the [[greatest common divisor]] of ''p'' and ''a'' is either 1 or ''p''.
must be an integer as well. Now, since ''p'' is prime the [[greatest common divisor]] of ''p'' and ''a'' is either 1 or ''p''. If it is ''p'' then the proof is complete since ''p''|''a'', so suppose that ''p'' does not divide ''a''. In this case we write
If it is ''p'' then the proof is complete since ''p''|''a'', so suppose that ''p'' does not divide ''a''.
 
In this case we write
:<math>a\frac{b}{p}=n\ ,</math>
:<math>a\frac{b}{p}=n\ ,</math>
and since gcd(''a'',''p'')=1 and ''n'' is an integer, ''b/p'' must also be an integer, say ''m''.
 
But then ''b=mp'' so ''p'' divides ''b''.
and since gcd(''a'', ''p'') = 1 and ''n'' is an integer, ''b/p'' must also be an integer, say ''m''.
But then ''b = mp'' so ''p'' divides ''b''.


Therefore in either case we have ''p'' dividing (at least) one of ''a'' and ''b'', and the proof is complete.
Therefore in either case we have ''p'' dividing (at least) one of ''a'' and ''b'', and the proof is complete.


[[category:Mathematics Workgroup]]
[[category:Mathematics Workgroup]]

Revision as of 19:26, 3 August 2007

In number theory, Euclid's lemma, named after the ancient Greek geometer and number theorist Euclid of Alexandria, states that if a prime number p is a divisor of the product of two integers, ab, then either p is a divisor of a or p is a divisor of b (or both).

Euclid's lemma is used in the proof of the unique factorization theorem, which states that a number cannot have more than one prime factorization.

Proof of the lemma

Let a, b, p with p prime, and suppose that p is a divisor of ab, p|ab. Then there exists an integer n such that ab = pn. But this means that the fraction

must be an integer as well. Now, since p is prime the greatest common divisor of p and a is either 1 or p. If it is p then the proof is complete since p|a, so suppose that p does not divide a. In this case we write

and since gcd(a, p) = 1 and n is an integer, b/p must also be an integer, say m. But then b = mp so p divides b.

Therefore in either case we have p dividing (at least) one of a and b, and the proof is complete.