Talk:Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Jason S. Colflesh
No edit summary
 
imported>Todd Coles
(checklist)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions
|                cat1 = History
|                cat2 = Politics
|                cat3 = Law
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = n
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = --[[User:Todd Coles|Todd Coles]] 15:24, 3 August 2007 (CDT)
}}
I noticed down in The Resolutions sections the following: "Both resolutions not only condemned the Alien and Sedition Acts as unconstitutional They went to claim that individual states could nullify federal laws deemed to be unconstitutional."  I wasn't sure if the intent was to have separate sentances, have a comma, or something else, so I left it alone.  --[[User:Jason S. Colflesh|Jason S. Colflesh]] 16:05, 30 July 2007 (CDT)
I noticed down in The Resolutions sections the following: "Both resolutions not only condemned the Alien and Sedition Acts as unconstitutional They went to claim that individual states could nullify federal laws deemed to be unconstitutional."  I wasn't sure if the intent was to have separate sentances, have a comma, or something else, so I left it alone.  --[[User:Jason S. Colflesh|Jason S. Colflesh]] 16:05, 30 July 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 14:24, 3 August 2007


Article Checklist for "Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions"
Workgroup category or categories History Workgroup, Politics Workgroup, Law Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by --Todd Coles 15:24, 3 August 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





I noticed down in The Resolutions sections the following: "Both resolutions not only condemned the Alien and Sedition Acts as unconstitutional They went to claim that individual states could nullify federal laws deemed to be unconstitutional." I wasn't sure if the intent was to have separate sentances, have a comma, or something else, so I left it alone. --Jason S. Colflesh 16:05, 30 July 2007 (CDT)