File talk:Gruenewald IsenheimAltarpiece Crucifixion.jpg: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Arne Eickenberg |
imported>Stephen Ewen (Hard documentation, such as a link to the official source where it explicitly states that the collection was released under the GFDL is really what is needed. Otherwise the GFDL is only heresay.) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Yorck Project== | ==Yorck Project== | ||
The Yorck Project is directly affiliated with directmedia; they even have the same e-mail address. The Yorck Project libraries and the Wikipress releases are all available via directmedia. —[[User:Arne Eickenberg|Arne Eickenberg]] 21:54, 21 July 2007 (CDT) | The Yorck Project is directly affiliated with directmedia; they even have the same e-mail address. The Yorck Project libraries and the Wikipress releases are all available via directmedia. —[[User:Arne Eickenberg|Arne Eickenberg]] 21:54, 21 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
:The original piece of art is of course PD. However, when taken from a collection, facts need to be known about that so they can be assessed. Hard documentation, such as a link to the official source where it explicitly states that the collection was released under the GFDL is really what is needed. Otherwise the GFDL is only heresay and we must not state it as fact, and the image thus continues to have an issue. —[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] [[User talk:Stephen Ewen|(Talk)]] 01:58, 24 July 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 00:58, 24 July 2007
Further sources…
…independent from Wikipedia on the GFDL:
- http://recentchanges.de/blog/2005/04/10000-gemalde-fuer-commons/#comments
- http://www.roma-antiqua.de/service/quellen
—Arne Eickenberg 21:37, 21 July 2007 (CDT)
- Do you see anything at http://www.yorckproject.de/ ? —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 21:37, 21 July 2007 (CDT)
Yorck Project
The Yorck Project is directly affiliated with directmedia; they even have the same e-mail address. The Yorck Project libraries and the Wikipress releases are all available via directmedia. —Arne Eickenberg 21:54, 21 July 2007 (CDT)
- The original piece of art is of course PD. However, when taken from a collection, facts need to be known about that so they can be assessed. Hard documentation, such as a link to the official source where it explicitly states that the collection was released under the GFDL is really what is needed. Otherwise the GFDL is only heresay and we must not state it as fact, and the image thus continues to have an issue. —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 01:58, 24 July 2007 (CDT)
