Talk:Sam Ervin: Difference between revisions
imported>Yi Zhe Wu No edit summary |
imported>Bruce M. Tindall No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| by = [[User:Yi Zhe Wu|Yi Zhe Wu]] 13:56, 26 May 2007 (CDT) | | by = [[User:Yi Zhe Wu|Yi Zhe Wu]] 13:56, 26 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
}} | }} | ||
I think the previous version ("As a Southerner, Ervin opposed Civil Rights legislation and the ERA") might have been a bit too universal a generalization about "Southerner[s]". Many Southerners -- Martin Luther King, for example -- and even a significant number of white Southerners favored Civil Rights laws. And while it is true that many of the states that failed to ratify the ERA were in the Southeast, quite a few of those states did at least come close to ratifying it, with many white male state legislators voting in favor of the amendment. The question that the previous formulation begs, though, is whether Ervin opposed these laws because he was a Southerner, or because he was a strict constructionist, or a civil libertarian, or a conservative, or a racist and sexist. Each of those suggestions has been advanced and debated, but none of them can be presented as a matter of fact. So I think we should hedge the attribution of the [i]cause[/i] of his opposition to those measures, whether it's with my wording or something better. [[User:Bruce M.Tindall|Bruce M.Tindall]] 16:56, 28 August 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 16:56, 28 August 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Politics Workgroup, History Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Yi Zhe Wu 13:56, 26 May 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
I think the previous version ("As a Southerner, Ervin opposed Civil Rights legislation and the ERA") might have been a bit too universal a generalization about "Southerner[s]". Many Southerners -- Martin Luther King, for example -- and even a significant number of white Southerners favored Civil Rights laws. And while it is true that many of the states that failed to ratify the ERA were in the Southeast, quite a few of those states did at least come close to ratifying it, with many white male state legislators voting in favor of the amendment. The question that the previous formulation begs, though, is whether Ervin opposed these laws because he was a Southerner, or because he was a strict constructionist, or a civil libertarian, or a conservative, or a racist and sexist. Each of those suggestions has been advanced and debated, but none of them can be presented as a matter of fact. So I think we should hedge the attribution of the [i]cause[/i] of his opposition to those measures, whether it's with my wording or something better. Bruce M.Tindall 16:56, 28 August 2007 (CDT)
- Politics Category Check
- General Category Check
- History Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Politics Advanced Articles
- Politics Nonstub Articles
- Politics Internal Articles
- History Advanced Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Politics Developed Articles
- History Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Politics Developing Articles
- History Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Politics Stub Articles
- History Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Politics External Articles
- History External Articles
- Politics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- Politics Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- History Cleanup
- Cleanup