Talk:Intelligent design movement: Difference between revisions
imported>Gareth Leng No edit summary |
imported>Yi Zhe Wu (National Review article) |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
I've moved some criticism from ID here, as it seemed more directed at the proponents than at the theory.[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 08:53, 22 May 2007 (CDT) | I've moved some criticism from ID here, as it seemed more directed at the proponents than at the theory.[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 08:53, 22 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
== National Review article == | |||
[http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/akyol200512020813.asp This article in National Review] probably can serve as a good source to understand the movement. [[User:Yi Zhe Wu|Yi Zhe Wu]] 15:51, 26 May 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 15:51, 26 May 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Biology Workgroup, Philosophy Workgroup, Religion Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Matt Innis (Talk) 19:37, 17 May 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
In brief:
abc means the form of the title for alphabetization, e.g. "Doherty, John". cat1, cat2 and cat3 are categories; if there is only one category, put it in cat1. cat_check: put "yes" if you want someone to check over the categories status: 0 for approved articles; 1 developed, 2 developing, 3 stub, 4 external underlinked: put "yes" if not enough other articles link to it (click "What links here" at left) cleanup: put "yes" if basic cleanup has been done. by: Names of anyone editing the checklist, in reverse chronological order. Retrieved from "http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Template:Checklist"
Again, where does this initial quotation come from? --Larry Sanger 08:39, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
- I have no idea. Will Nesbitt 10:59, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
I've moved some criticism from ID here, as it seemed more directed at the proponents than at the theory.Gareth Leng 08:53, 22 May 2007 (CDT)
National Review article
This article in National Review probably can serve as a good source to understand the movement. Yi Zhe Wu 15:51, 26 May 2007 (CDT)
- Biology Category Check
- General Category Check
- Philosophy Category Check
- Religion Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Biology Advanced Articles
- Biology Nonstub Articles
- Biology Internal Articles
- Philosophy Advanced Articles
- Philosophy Nonstub Articles
- Philosophy Internal Articles
- Religion Advanced Articles
- Religion Nonstub Articles
- Religion Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Biology Developed Articles
- Philosophy Developed Articles
- Religion Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Biology Developing Articles
- Philosophy Developing Articles
- Religion Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Biology Stub Articles
- Philosophy Stub Articles
- Religion Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Biology External Articles
- Philosophy External Articles
- Religion External Articles
- Biology Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Philosophy Underlinked Articles
- Religion Underlinked Articles
- Biology Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Philosophy Cleanup
- Religion Cleanup