User talk:Eric Winesett

Hi, Eric-- I will try to expand on the articles I've started but just haven't had the time yet. I never intended for any to remain stubs indefinitely.--Greg Lawrence 19:42, 15 May 2007 (CDT)

Being bold

Thank you very much for your encouraging comments at Talk:Contraception (medical methods)/Draft. What I've been doing is going ahead and editing in any changes (small or large) except those which I think have a significant risk of being rejected by others. Perhaps I need to adjust that: only those with a larger risk of being rejected could be suggested first on the talk page, while those with a smaller risk of being rejected could be edited in and then reverted (with explanation) by others if necessary. My habits might be based on a misunderstanding that I and some others had earlier, that reverting was against the rules; I think it turned out that it was only reverting without explanation that was against the rules. So perhaps I can be bolder in general. Yes, some of the changes you did were the same as some things I had suggested; others were different. I only went through the article once so there may have been things I missed. I agree with you that an article should have things like subject-verb agreement fixed before approval. --Catherine Woodgold 07:35, 3 June 2007 (CDT)

Film--media or visual arts or what?

Hi Eric--where did you initiate the discussion of what category popular movies were to go into? I've broken down and joined the CZ forums.... Aleta Curry 00:08, 6 June 2007 (CDT)

On vacation

I am on vacation, possibly without internet access, until June 16th. --Eric Winesett 00:03, 8 June 2007 (CDT)

Write-a-thon, again!

Hi, Eric! You've been busy with the core articles, cool! Are you coming to the party? Aleta Curry 06:08, 3 October 2007 (CDT)

Mr. D. Duck

You're right; it's redundant. Apologies! --Robert W King 09:58, 9 November 2007 (CST)

So glad that resolved quickly. I was dreading a long argument. --Eric Winesett 11:17, 9 November 2007 (CST)