Talk:Ireland (island): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>W. Frank (Great start!) |
imported>Wahib Frank (Ireland: an unusual topography?) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I like the tone, emphasis and language. Great stuff! [Glance at the new lead sentence of the United Kingdom article and see what's being done to it if you want to feel like Voltaire by comparison (wry grin)].[[User:W. Frank|W. Frank]] 09:23, 29 April 2007 (CDT) | I like the tone, emphasis and language. Great stuff! [Glance at the new lead sentence of the United Kingdom article and see what's being done to it if you want to feel like Voltaire by comparison (wry grin)].[[User:W. Frank|W. Frank]] 09:23, 29 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
::Would it help to mention that, at least in classical times, Ireland was considered to be an unusual island in having the centre as relatively low lying with fringing coasts of high ground? [[User:Wahib Frank|Wahib Frank]] 18:09, 6 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:09, 6 May 2007
You're off to a cracking good start with your sandbox article, Anton.
I like the tone, emphasis and language. Great stuff! [Glance at the new lead sentence of the United Kingdom article and see what's being done to it if you want to feel like Voltaire by comparison (wry grin)].W. Frank 09:23, 29 April 2007 (CDT)
- Would it help to mention that, at least in classical times, Ireland was considered to be an unusual island in having the centre as relatively low lying with fringing coasts of high ground? Wahib Frank 18:09, 6 May 2007 (CDT)