Talk:Sathya Sai Baba: Difference between revisions
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (→Trying for better readability: new section) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Wait a bit before deletion, please. [[User:Andries Krugers Dagneaux|Andries]] 10:12, 19 May 2007 (CDT) | Wait a bit before deletion, please. [[User:Andries Krugers Dagneaux|Andries]] 10:12, 19 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
== Trying for better readability == | |||
Let me preface my comments by saying I have no preformed opinion about the subject, but find the article hard enough to read that I can't form an opinion from it. As a result, I have tried to clean up some of the references, especially with embedded quotes that need to be seen in critics. I have, unless in a direct quote, tried to remove words such as "skeptic" and "follower", which we found to be needlessly polarizing in the ground rules on working on homeopathy. | |||
There are far too many references; it is impossible to check which are anecdotal and which are authoritative. | |||
So far, I'm simply trying to clean up. Whether a readable article can result is a good question; would Religion Editors please look at this? [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 16:15, 16 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:15, 16 February 2009
The entry needs to be far more concise. Andries 22:10, 23 April 2007 (CDT)
Wait a bit before deletion, please. Andries 10:12, 19 May 2007 (CDT)
Trying for better readability
Let me preface my comments by saying I have no preformed opinion about the subject, but find the article hard enough to read that I can't form an opinion from it. As a result, I have tried to clean up some of the references, especially with embedded quotes that need to be seen in critics. I have, unless in a direct quote, tried to remove words such as "skeptic" and "follower", which we found to be needlessly polarizing in the ground rules on working on homeopathy.
There are far too many references; it is impossible to check which are anecdotal and which are authoritative.
So far, I'm simply trying to clean up. Whether a readable article can result is a good question; would Religion Editors please look at this? Howard C. Berkowitz 16:15, 16 February 2009 (UTC)