Talk:Onslow Beach: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Louis F. Sander No edit summary |
imported>Larry Sanger (Interesting issues raised here) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| cat3 = | | cat3 = | ||
| cat_check = | | cat_check = | ||
| status = | | status = 3 | ||
| underlinked = yes | | underlinked = yes | ||
| cleanup = | | cleanup = | ||
| by = [[User:Louis F. Sander|Louis F. Sander]] 10:35, 22 April 2007 (CDT) | | by = [[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 21:02, 20 May 2007 (CDT); [[User:Louis F. Sander|Louis F. Sander]] 10:35, 22 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
}} | }} | ||
I intend to maintain this article on Citizendium. I wrote 100% of it for Wikipedia during 2006. [[User:Louis F. Sander|Louis F. Sander]] 10:35, 22 April 2007 (CDT) | I intend to maintain this article on Citizendium. I wrote 100% of it for Wikipedia during 2006. [[User:Louis F. Sander|Louis F. Sander]] 10:35, 22 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
This is a stub, at best. Unless we think we can say nothing more interesting about Onslow Beach, which then raises the question whether it is possible for stub-length articles can in fact be complete--which is an interesting problem. According to [[CZ:Article Deletion Policy|Article Deletion Policy]], this article is not only not developed, it could be deleted precisely because it is only 49 words long. I don't propose that we delete it, but the issues it raises are interesting and worth discussing. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 21:02, 20 May 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 21:02, 20 May 2007
Workgroup category or categories | History Workgroup, Military Workgroup [Please add or review categories] |
Article status | Stub: no more than a few sentences |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | No |
Checklist last edited by | Larry Sanger 21:02, 20 May 2007 (CDT); Louis F. Sander 10:35, 22 April 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
I intend to maintain this article on Citizendium. I wrote 100% of it for Wikipedia during 2006. Louis F. Sander 10:35, 22 April 2007 (CDT)
This is a stub, at best. Unless we think we can say nothing more interesting about Onslow Beach, which then raises the question whether it is possible for stub-length articles can in fact be complete--which is an interesting problem. According to Article Deletion Policy, this article is not only not developed, it could be deleted precisely because it is only 49 words long. I don't propose that we delete it, but the issues it raises are interesting and worth discussing. --Larry Sanger 21:02, 20 May 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- History Category Check
- General Category Check
- Military Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- History Advanced Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Military Advanced Articles
- Military Nonstub Articles
- Military Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- History Developed Articles
- Military Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- History Developing Articles
- Military Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- History Stub Articles
- Military Stub Articles
- External Articles
- History External Articles
- Military External Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Military Underlinked Articles
- History Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Military Cleanup
- Cleanup