Talk:Patent: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
imported>Stan Protigal (→Recent ruling: Alice - but maybe not.) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
There was some recent ruling on patent litigation, but for the life of me I can't find the source. Within the past day or two.--[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 13:13, 2 May 2007 (CDT) | There was some recent ruling on patent litigation, but for the life of me I can't find the source. Within the past day or two.--[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 13:13, 2 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
Should consider a page on the US ''Alice'' decision. This affects computer implementation of human activity and similar issues with biotech. It seems very much of concern for inventors in certain fields. That said, the Wikipedia articles on law cases (including this one) are generally of good quality. [[User:Stan Protigal|Stan Protigal]] ([[User talk:Stan Protigal|talk]]) 04:41, 3 June 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:41, 2 June 2018
Recent ruling
There was some recent ruling on patent litigation, but for the life of me I can't find the source. Within the past day or two.--Robert W King 13:13, 2 May 2007 (CDT)
Should consider a page on the US Alice decision. This affects computer implementation of human activity and similar issues with biotech. It seems very much of concern for inventors in certain fields. That said, the Wikipedia articles on law cases (including this one) are generally of good quality. Stan Protigal (talk) 04:41, 3 June 2018 (UTC)