Talk:Tux/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Joshua David Williams
No edit summary
imported>Eric M Gearhart
(Citation)
Line 18: Line 18:


::It took a lot of digging, but I finally found the accurate origin of the name. It was not made by Linus at all, and has a two-fold meaning. See the citations on the naming section. --[[User:Joshua David Williams|Joshua David Williams]] 19:19, 7 April 2007 (CDT)
::It took a lot of digging, but I finally found the accurate origin of the name. It was not made by Linus at all, and has a two-fold meaning. See the citations on the naming section. --[[User:Joshua David Williams|Joshua David Williams]] 19:19, 7 April 2007 (CDT)
::Also I'd say it would make sense to throw a citation right after "In 1996, a discussion was started on the Linux kernel mailing list of what to use as the Linux logo. Early on, some proposed that it should be a fierce animal. " with a link to the LKML post you're talking about... as for me it's 4:30 am and I'm heading to bed. I did enough tonight I think lol --[[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 19:24, 7 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 18:24, 7 April 2007


Article Checklist for "Tux/Draft"
Workgroup category or categories Computers Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Joshua David Williams 17:29, 7 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Did Linus name Tux? Got evidence for that? It's silly to say that "Tux" was not chosen because it was short for "Tuxedo." Surely the persons talking about the name saw that "Tux" is short for Tuxedo and liked the name partly for that reason. I mean, I don't know this, but surely that's how it went down. No? --Larry Sanger 17:48, 7 April 2007 (CDT)

I learned most of what I know from this page and the mailing list archive it links to towards the top. I know what you mean. I'll search the Usenet archives and see what I can find. --Joshua David Williams 17:51, 7 April 2007 (CDT)
I'd say just cite some references to back up what the article says and you're good (see PHP for a good example of the reference system) --Eric M Gearhart 18:22, 7 April 2007 (CDT)
It took a lot of digging, but I finally found the accurate origin of the name. It was not made by Linus at all, and has a two-fold meaning. See the citations on the naming section. --Joshua David Williams 19:19, 7 April 2007 (CDT)
Also I'd say it would make sense to throw a citation right after "In 1996, a discussion was started on the Linux kernel mailing list of what to use as the Linux logo. Early on, some proposed that it should be a fierce animal. " with a link to the LKML post you're talking about... as for me it's 4:30 am and I'm heading to bed. I did enough tonight I think lol --Eric M Gearhart 19:24, 7 April 2007 (CDT)