Talk:Agricultural crops: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Reuven Lazarus
m (checklist)
 
imported>Reuven Lazarus
(Title)
Line 10: Line 10:
|                  by = [[User:Reuven Lazarus|Reuven Lazarus]] 17:32, 1 April 2007 (CDT)
|                  by = [[User:Reuven Lazarus|Reuven Lazarus]] 17:32, 1 April 2007 (CDT)
}}
}}
== Title ==
I'm not sure if this article is at the right title.  On one level, the phrase "agricultural crops" just seems redundant to me - not to mention that it violates the singular-title convention.  So if it's going to be an article on crops, a move to "Crop" would seem appropriate.  But that's assuming the intention is to add more than the statistics that are currently here - as it stands, this isn't exactly an article on crops (which I assume would contain more general information).  If this is going to remain an article with statistics on top agricultural products, it should be renamed accordingly - although personally I'd think that should be a section of the "crop" article, rather than an entry of its own.
So, in short: I don't know what title belongs on this article, but I don't think it's this one. --[[User:Reuven Lazarus|Reuven Lazarus]] 17:43, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 16:43, 1 April 2007


Article Checklist for "Agricultural crops"
Workgroup category or categories Agriculture Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Stub: no more than a few sentences
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Reuven Lazarus 17:32, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Title

I'm not sure if this article is at the right title. On one level, the phrase "agricultural crops" just seems redundant to me - not to mention that it violates the singular-title convention. So if it's going to be an article on crops, a move to "Crop" would seem appropriate. But that's assuming the intention is to add more than the statistics that are currently here - as it stands, this isn't exactly an article on crops (which I assume would contain more general information). If this is going to remain an article with statistics on top agricultural products, it should be renamed accordingly - although personally I'd think that should be a section of the "crop" article, rather than an entry of its own.

So, in short: I don't know what title belongs on this article, but I don't think it's this one. --Reuven Lazarus 17:43, 1 April 2007 (CDT)